Comparison Overview

Macaran

VS

D.J.V. Label & Packaging

Macaran

18 New Courtland Street, Cohoes, NY, 12047, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

Macaran - A NextGen Label Group™ company provides our customers a variety of world-class label printing and packaging services to meet their brands’ objectives and requirements. This range of products includes pressure sensitive labels, flexible packaging, shrink sleeves, semi-rigid reseal labels and RFID labels. As the "Custodian of Your Brand" we focus on the Graphic, Functional, and Application requirements of your package, ensuring it delivers powerful shelf impact, as it was imagined and designed, every time. That, along with a never-ending commitment to quality and innovation makes us the label printer and packaging converter of choice for many of today’s most successful consumer brands.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 52
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

D.J.V. Label & Packaging

520 SUNDIAL DR, Waite Park, 56387, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

DJV will help you make your own private label for all your deli and other food needs. Ingredient labels for all your Sandwiches, Salads, Veggie Cups, Parfaits, Take & Bake Pizza, all your in store made food items. Bar code and sell by dating all on the same label. Also offering customer support and full service programs on all printers & software sold. We are the leaders in convenience store labeling programs. Our custom labels can be printed in limitless quantities to fit products and packaging of all shapes and sizes. Flexographic label printing provides a quick, cost-effective, high quality products. D.J.V. Label & Packaging is dedicated to making your label printing a smooth and easy process.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/macaran-printed-products.jpeg
Macaran
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/d.j.v.-label-&-packaging.jpeg
D.J.V. Label & Packaging
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Macaran
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
D.J.V. Label & Packaging
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Macaran in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for D.J.V. Label & Packaging in 2025.

Incident History — Macaran (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Macaran cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — D.J.V. Label & Packaging (X = Date, Y = Severity)

D.J.V. Label & Packaging cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/macaran-printed-products.jpeg
Macaran
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/d.j.v.-label-&-packaging.jpeg
D.J.V. Label & Packaging
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Macaran company and D.J.V. Label & Packaging company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, D.J.V. Label & Packaging company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Macaran company.

In the current year, D.J.V. Label & Packaging company and Macaran company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither D.J.V. Label & Packaging company nor Macaran company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither D.J.V. Label & Packaging company nor Macaran company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither D.J.V. Label & Packaging company nor Macaran company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Macaran company nor D.J.V. Label & Packaging company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Macaran nor D.J.V. Label & Packaging holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

D.J.V. Label & Packaging company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Macaran company.

Macaran company employs more people globally than D.J.V. Label & Packaging company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Macaran nor D.J.V. Label & Packaging holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Macaran nor D.J.V. Label & Packaging holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Macaran nor D.J.V. Label & Packaging holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Macaran nor D.J.V. Label & Packaging holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Macaran nor D.J.V. Label & Packaging holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Macaran nor D.J.V. Label & Packaging holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N