Comparison Overview

M. Lee Smith Publishers

VS

University of Notre Dame Press

M. Lee Smith Publishers

None
Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 750 and 799

M. Lee Smith Publishers (MLSP) is a leading provider of legal and practical information for human resources practitioners, attorneys, and other business and legal professionals. The company started in 1975 with one weekly newsletter, The Tennessee Journal, which gave a behind-the-scenes report on the Tennessee legislature. Today, the company has an extensive catalog of products and services providing state-specific and federal legal information covering all 50 states in print, online, and on DVD. The company also produces business directories and holds live, audio, and online conferences.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 24
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

University of Notre Dame Press

310 Flanner Hall, None, Notre Dame, IN, US, 46556
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

The University of Notre Dame Press, the largest Catholic university press in the world, publishes academic and general interest books that engage the most enduring questions of our time. We believe in the power of research to advance knowledge and impact lives, and of our books to connect scholars, experts, students, and readers in order to encourage intellectual exploration and enrich conversations on campus, across the country, and around the world. The Press primarily publishes in areas that align with the academic strengths of the University of Notre Dame, including religion, theology, history, philosophy, political science and theory, medieval studies, Irish studies, Latin American studies, and international relations. Through reviews, scholarly citations, and translations, our books extend the reach and reputation of the University. The University of Notre Dame Press is committed to maintaining an innovative and sustainable publishing program that makes accessible the ideas of today’s leading experts while fostering the next generation of scholars and thinkers. Although the world is confronted by an increasing number of imposing challenges, our books and authors are a powerful force for good in the world.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/m.-lee-smith-publishers.jpeg
M. Lee Smith Publishers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-notre-dame-press.jpeg
University of Notre Dame Press
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
M. Lee Smith Publishers
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
University of Notre Dame Press
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for M. Lee Smith Publishers in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of Notre Dame Press in 2025.

Incident History — M. Lee Smith Publishers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

M. Lee Smith Publishers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — University of Notre Dame Press (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of Notre Dame Press cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/m.-lee-smith-publishers.jpeg
M. Lee Smith Publishers
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-notre-dame-press.jpeg
University of Notre Dame Press
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both M. Lee Smith Publishers company and University of Notre Dame Press company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, University of Notre Dame Press company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to M. Lee Smith Publishers company.

In the current year, University of Notre Dame Press company and M. Lee Smith Publishers company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither University of Notre Dame Press company nor M. Lee Smith Publishers company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither University of Notre Dame Press company nor M. Lee Smith Publishers company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither University of Notre Dame Press company nor M. Lee Smith Publishers company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither M. Lee Smith Publishers company nor University of Notre Dame Press company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither M. Lee Smith Publishers nor University of Notre Dame Press holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither M. Lee Smith Publishers company nor University of Notre Dame Press company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

M. Lee Smith Publishers company employs more people globally than University of Notre Dame Press company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither M. Lee Smith Publishers nor University of Notre Dame Press holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither M. Lee Smith Publishers nor University of Notre Dame Press holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither M. Lee Smith Publishers nor University of Notre Dame Press holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither M. Lee Smith Publishers nor University of Notre Dame Press holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither M. Lee Smith Publishers nor University of Notre Dame Press holds HIPAA certification.

Neither M. Lee Smith Publishers nor University of Notre Dame Press holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.