Comparison Overview

M&S Law

VS

Krueger & Juelich, PLLC

M&S Law

None
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

M&S Law is based in Blackburn with easy motorway access and ample parking. We are a friendly and approachable firm with many decades of experience in different areas of law. We are able to offer a comprehensive range of legal services and are committed to offering an excellent service to all our clients. We are also able to offer meeting room facilities for face to face consultations. So, whether you need assistance in buying or selling a house, making a Will, looking to set up a Trust, Estate Planning, Probate Disputes, Family Law advice, Housing Disrepair advice, Personal Injury advice, Industrial Disease advice, or you simply need some help with another matter, we are here to help. Our team of highly qualified solicitors and support staff would be delighted to work with you to resolve any issues you may have. We believe that your success determines our success and every client is different. We offer a wide range of quality services to our clients and that has enabled us to grow in recent years. We are able to offer many different types of funding including No Win No Fee Agreements, Fixed Fees and Hourly Rate charges subject to each individual case. Please contact us for further information.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Krueger & Juelich, PLLC

601 Carlson Parkway, Minnetonka, Minnesota, 55305, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Krueger & Juelich , PLLC is a Professional Family Law and Estate Planning law firm in the St. Paul and Minneapolis metro area. In addition to representing clients in all phases of family law litigation and settlement, Krueger & Juelich provides alternative dispute resolution services for Family Law issues.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/m-s-law.jpeg
M&S Law
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/krueger-&-juelich-pllc.jpeg
Krueger & Juelich, PLLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
M&S Law
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Krueger & Juelich, PLLC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for M&S Law in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Krueger & Juelich, PLLC in 2025.

Incident History — M&S Law (X = Date, Y = Severity)

M&S Law cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Krueger & Juelich, PLLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Krueger & Juelich, PLLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/m-s-law.jpeg
M&S Law
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/krueger-&-juelich-pllc.jpeg
Krueger & Juelich, PLLC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

M&S Law company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Krueger & Juelich, PLLC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Krueger & Juelich, PLLC company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to M&S Law company.

In the current year, Krueger & Juelich, PLLC company and M&S Law company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Krueger & Juelich, PLLC company nor M&S Law company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Krueger & Juelich, PLLC company nor M&S Law company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Krueger & Juelich, PLLC company nor M&S Law company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither M&S Law company nor Krueger & Juelich, PLLC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither M&S Law nor Krueger & Juelich, PLLC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither M&S Law company nor Krueger & Juelich, PLLC company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

M&S Law company employs more people globally than Krueger & Juelich, PLLC company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither M&S Law nor Krueger & Juelich, PLLC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither M&S Law nor Krueger & Juelich, PLLC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither M&S Law nor Krueger & Juelich, PLLC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither M&S Law nor Krueger & Juelich, PLLC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither M&S Law nor Krueger & Juelich, PLLC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither M&S Law nor Krueger & Juelich, PLLC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X