Comparison Overview

M&R Label Company

VS

CGP Printing • Apparel • Fulfillment • Distribution

M&R Label Company

2401 Bond St, University Park, Illinois, US, 60484
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 750 and 799

For 35+ years, we have been manufacturing custom labels and redefined what is to be expected of a high-quality label printing partner. Countless companies across different industries continually call on our expertise and depend on our express service. So what makes us so special? At M&R Label, the customer has, and always will, come first. We understand the importance of great packaging; as both an extension and a defining element of your brand, you deserve packaging that authentically represents your company’s passion and excellence. That is why we are constantly investing in the highest quality people, technology and equipment. We are passionate about our customers and, in that spirit, we are committed to providing ALL of our customers with excellence and comprehensive, turnkey service – quick turnaround times, quality labels, competitive pricing and great customer service. We think of our customers as partners and we will do everything we can to help you achieve your goals.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

CGP Printing • Apparel • Fulfillment • Distribution

6600 Bay Circle, Norcross, GA, 30071, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17

For more than 30 years, CGP has been leading the way in commercial printing, apparel, fulfillment and distribution excellence. Our professional staff is dedicated to working closely with you to create solutions to achieve your goals whether you need just one marketing service such as custom printed brochures, signs, displays, banners, embroidered apparel, or you need an all in one plan that covers development to distribution. Our state of the art, fully equipped 80,000 sq. ft. facility provides us the ability to offer turnkey solutions. Regardless of size or the complexity of your project, we can offer you the right solution that meets your needs. Email: [email protected] Phone: 770.729.1145 Website: cgpconnect.com

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/m-r-graphics.jpeg
M&R Label Company
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cgp-connect.jpeg
CGP Printing • Apparel • Fulfillment • Distribution
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
M&R Label Company
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
CGP Printing • Apparel • Fulfillment • Distribution
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for M&R Label Company in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CGP Printing • Apparel • Fulfillment • Distribution in 2025.

Incident History — M&R Label Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

M&R Label Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — CGP Printing • Apparel • Fulfillment • Distribution (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CGP Printing • Apparel • Fulfillment • Distribution cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/m-r-graphics.jpeg
M&R Label Company
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cgp-connect.jpeg
CGP Printing • Apparel • Fulfillment • Distribution
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

CGP Printing • Apparel • Fulfillment • Distribution company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to M&R Label Company company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, CGP Printing • Apparel • Fulfillment • Distribution company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to M&R Label Company company.

In the current year, CGP Printing • Apparel • Fulfillment • Distribution company and M&R Label Company company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither CGP Printing • Apparel • Fulfillment • Distribution company nor M&R Label Company company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither CGP Printing • Apparel • Fulfillment • Distribution company nor M&R Label Company company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither CGP Printing • Apparel • Fulfillment • Distribution company nor M&R Label Company company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither M&R Label Company company nor CGP Printing • Apparel • Fulfillment • Distribution company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither M&R Label Company nor CGP Printing • Apparel • Fulfillment • Distribution holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither M&R Label Company company nor CGP Printing • Apparel • Fulfillment • Distribution company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

CGP Printing • Apparel • Fulfillment • Distribution company employs more people globally than M&R Label Company company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither M&R Label Company nor CGP Printing • Apparel • Fulfillment • Distribution holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither M&R Label Company nor CGP Printing • Apparel • Fulfillment • Distribution holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither M&R Label Company nor CGP Printing • Apparel • Fulfillment • Distribution holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither M&R Label Company nor CGP Printing • Apparel • Fulfillment • Distribution holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither M&R Label Company nor CGP Printing • Apparel • Fulfillment • Distribution holds HIPAA certification.

Neither M&R Label Company nor CGP Printing • Apparel • Fulfillment • Distribution holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N