Comparison Overview

M&M Systems, Inc.

VS

Kopar

M&M Systems, Inc.

undefined, undefined, undefined, 32174, US
Last Update: 2025-11-20
Between 750 and 799

M&M Systems is a leader in the design and manufacturing of cutting edge automated control systems. We provide solutions from simple commercially sold units to complex industrial systems. Specializing in industrial refrigeration controls and commercial HVAC/R control systems, our focus is on energy savings and safety to provide affordable control systems that increase the efficiency of our customer’s facilities or products. As a result, M&M Systems’ customers range from Fortune 500 companies to smaller companies who want quality, reliability and low life cycle costs designed into their products.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Kopar

Tomas Alba Edison 3116, Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, 64299, MX
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

For 35+ years, Kopar has been a value-added provider specialized in the distribution of high-tech products. We are committed to transform the industry with best in class products and solutions. Our products include robotics, vision systems, motion control, and many more automation components that enable us to reach new areas of innovation and meet automation needs. We are committed to be a business that is easy to do business with. Our people work hard to develop innovative ideas and are experts in providing value-added solutions that exceed customers’ expectations by allowing them to be more competitive in their respective markets. Every request is carefully evaluated and backed up by technically trained teams and a solid corporate structure. Kopar has 14 branches located in Mexico, USA, and Costa Rica to serve all of our customers in a wide range of industries.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 219
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/m&m-systems-inc..jpeg
M&M Systems, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kopar.jpeg
Kopar
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
M&M Systems, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Kopar
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for M&M Systems, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kopar in 2025.

Incident History — M&M Systems, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

M&M Systems, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Kopar (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kopar cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/m&m-systems-inc..jpeg
M&M Systems, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kopar.jpeg
Kopar
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Kopar company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to M&M Systems, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Kopar company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to M&M Systems, Inc. company.

In the current year, Kopar company and M&M Systems, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Kopar company nor M&M Systems, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Kopar company nor M&M Systems, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Kopar company nor M&M Systems, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither M&M Systems, Inc. company nor Kopar company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither M&M Systems, Inc. nor Kopar holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Kopar company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to M&M Systems, Inc. company.

Kopar company employs more people globally than M&M Systems, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Automation.

Neither M&M Systems, Inc. nor Kopar holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither M&M Systems, Inc. nor Kopar holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither M&M Systems, Inc. nor Kopar holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither M&M Systems, Inc. nor Kopar holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither M&M Systems, Inc. nor Kopar holds HIPAA certification.

Neither M&M Systems, Inc. nor Kopar holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H