Comparison Overview

M&M Printing and Graphics

VS

Blitzprint

M&M Printing and Graphics

None
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://mmprintingandgraphics.com

M&M Printing and Graphics has been serving the Pee Dee Region of South Carolina for almost 30 years. We've grown from a simple blueprint shop to the leading Print, Copy, Design firm in our area. First again.... you will often here us say. We have led the way in introducing products and services to help our customers prosper. First, such as color laser copying back in the early 80's to digital printing technology in the 90's to wide-format digital printing for display graphics that have been such a great addition of late. Other current first include Scanning/Archiving services, wide-format color scanning, digital commercial photography and fine art reproduction. We're proud of the strong roots we've built in our community. We pride ourselves on being a complete source for all of your business communications needs and have always been on the leading edge of technology. We understand that an investment in technology can actually save money by improving efficiencies. We will continue to evolve as a diversely skilled, fast-moving team of professionals ready to learn from each other and meet whatever challenges our clients may face.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 21
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Blitzprint

None
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799
http://www.blitzprint.com

Blitzprint Inc provides a wide range of affordable publishing, editing, distribution, and print services for publishers and independent authors. Our mission is to equip authors with the right combination of services, know-how, expert support, and continuous guidance required to level the playing field with their traditionally published counterparts, so that they can succeed in the highly competitive book marketplace. Blitzprint also serves the commercial print market. We incorporate Web2Print procurement technology in companies ranging from 10 employees to 6000 employees.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/m&m-printing-and-graphics.jpeg
M&M Printing and Graphics
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Blitzprint
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
M&M Printing and Graphics
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Blitzprint
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for M&M Printing and Graphics in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Blitzprint in 2025.

Incident History — M&M Printing and Graphics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

M&M Printing and Graphics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Blitzprint (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Blitzprint cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/m&m-printing-and-graphics.jpeg
M&M Printing and Graphics
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Blitzprint
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Blitzprint company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to M&M Printing and Graphics company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Blitzprint company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to M&M Printing and Graphics company.

In the current year, Blitzprint company and M&M Printing and Graphics company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Blitzprint company nor M&M Printing and Graphics company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Blitzprint company nor M&M Printing and Graphics company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Blitzprint company nor M&M Printing and Graphics company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither M&M Printing and Graphics company nor Blitzprint company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither M&M Printing and Graphics nor Blitzprint holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither M&M Printing and Graphics company nor Blitzprint company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

M&M Printing and Graphics company employs more people globally than Blitzprint company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither M&M Printing and Graphics nor Blitzprint holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither M&M Printing and Graphics nor Blitzprint holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither M&M Printing and Graphics nor Blitzprint holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither M&M Printing and Graphics nor Blitzprint holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither M&M Printing and Graphics nor Blitzprint holds HIPAA certification.

Neither M&M Printing and Graphics nor Blitzprint holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References