Comparison Overview

M&M Printed Bag, Inc.

VS

Crossmark Graphics, Inc.

M&M Printed Bag, Inc.

5651 Kimball Ct, Chino, California, 91710, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11

At M&M Printed Bag, Inc. our Plastic Bags product line is diverse and designed to meet the specific needs of various sectors. In addition to our standard plastic bags, we also provide specialty bags tailored to specific industry needs. These include anti-static bags, tamper-evident bags, biohazard bags, and more. These specialized bags are designed to address unique packaging challenges and ensure the safety and security of the contents.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Crossmark Graphics, Inc.

16100 West Overland Drive, None, New Berlin, WI, US, 53151
Last Update: 2025-12-12

Crossmark Graphics is a family-owned business and a direct manufacturer of printing solutions that also purchases promotional material for some of the most recognizable brands in the United States. We have the ability to make crucial decisions quickly, before small problems have a chance to affect job quality. We handle virtually everything in-house, keeping each aspect of your job under a critical microscope as it takes shape, from planning through delivery. Our engineering department is always looking for ways to produce your job in the most economical way possible while meeting our quality benchmarks and delivering the latest innovations. Our clients value Crossmark Graphics as a strategic partner and not part of a billion-dollar conglomerate or holding company. Our owners are directly involved with each aspect of your business to help insure that you are receiving the best pricing by leveraging our suppliers and showing you new efficiencies. We offer a full spectrum of services including: LED UV printing 40", Cold-Foil Printing, 20 x 26 Digital Printing, Large Format Digital, Lenticular, Creative Department, Pre-Press, Die-Cutting, Folders Gluers, Ink-jetting and mailing capabilities, Finishing, Fulfillment/Kit Packing/Warehousing. The result is a harmonious working environment that attracts extraordinarily gifted co-workers that care deeply about consistently making you happy.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 55
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/m&m-printed-bag-inc.jpeg
M&M Printed Bag, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/crossmark-graphics-inc..jpeg
Crossmark Graphics, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
M&M Printed Bag, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Crossmark Graphics, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for M&M Printed Bag, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Crossmark Graphics, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — M&M Printed Bag, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

M&M Printed Bag, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Crossmark Graphics, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Crossmark Graphics, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/m&m-printed-bag-inc.jpeg
M&M Printed Bag, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/crossmark-graphics-inc..jpeg
Crossmark Graphics, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

M&M Printed Bag, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Crossmark Graphics, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Crossmark Graphics, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to M&M Printed Bag, Inc. company.

In the current year, Crossmark Graphics, Inc. company and M&M Printed Bag, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Crossmark Graphics, Inc. company nor M&M Printed Bag, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Crossmark Graphics, Inc. company nor M&M Printed Bag, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Crossmark Graphics, Inc. company nor M&M Printed Bag, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither M&M Printed Bag, Inc. company nor Crossmark Graphics, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither M&M Printed Bag, Inc. nor Crossmark Graphics, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither M&M Printed Bag, Inc. company nor Crossmark Graphics, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Crossmark Graphics, Inc. company employs more people globally than M&M Printed Bag, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither M&M Printed Bag, Inc. nor Crossmark Graphics, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither M&M Printed Bag, Inc. nor Crossmark Graphics, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither M&M Printed Bag, Inc. nor Crossmark Graphics, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither M&M Printed Bag, Inc. nor Crossmark Graphics, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither M&M Printed Bag, Inc. nor Crossmark Graphics, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither M&M Printed Bag, Inc. nor Crossmark Graphics, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L