Comparison Overview

Maternal & Infant Health Consulting

VS

Galveston County Health District

Maternal & Infant Health Consulting

None, None, Salt Lake City, Utah, US, 84015
Last Update: 2025-11-28

M&IHC is a women-owned social impact consulting firm dedicated to advancing global public health through research, facilitation, and communications. We harness the power of digital health to bridge the gap between public health research and program implementation to improve health outcomes, primarily for women of reproductive age and children under five. Our content focus areas are reproductive rights, family planning, nutrition, micronutrients, breastfeeding, donor human milk, immunizations, breastfeeding, and digital health. Let's Connect! Email M&IHC at: [email protected] Follow Us on Twitter @M_I_Health Join our Hub: We are always looking for experienced consultants for short-, medium-, and long-term technical assignments. If you are interested in being considered for a position on our Hub of Independent Contractors, please provide us with your information: https://www.mihealthconsulting.com/connect

NAICS: 92312
NAICS Definition: Administration of Public Health Programs
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Galveston County Health District

9850 Emmett F Lowry Expy, Texas City, 77591, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

The Galveston County Health District is committed to identifying public health issues that impact our everyday life. We work daily to prevent disease, protect against public health threats and promote good health for all of Galveston County. Mission: Protecting and promoting the One Health of Galveston County. Vision: To be a pillar, promoter, protector, and provider of healthfulness in Galveston County. Mission: Protecting and promoting the optimal health and well-being of Galveston County. Vision: To become the healthiest county in Texas.

NAICS: 92312
NAICS Definition: Administration of Public Health Programs
Employees: 258
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/m&ihc.jpeg
Maternal & Infant Health Consulting
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/galveston-county-health-district.jpeg
Galveston County Health District
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Maternal & Infant Health Consulting
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Galveston County Health District
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Health Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Maternal & Infant Health Consulting in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Health Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Galveston County Health District in 2025.

Incident History — Maternal & Infant Health Consulting (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Maternal & Infant Health Consulting cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Galveston County Health District (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Galveston County Health District cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/m&ihc.jpeg
Maternal & Infant Health Consulting
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/galveston-county-health-district.jpeg
Galveston County Health District
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Galveston County Health District company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Maternal & Infant Health Consulting company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Galveston County Health District company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Maternal & Infant Health Consulting company.

In the current year, Galveston County Health District company and Maternal & Infant Health Consulting company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Galveston County Health District company nor Maternal & Infant Health Consulting company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Galveston County Health District company nor Maternal & Infant Health Consulting company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Galveston County Health District company nor Maternal & Infant Health Consulting company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Maternal & Infant Health Consulting company nor Galveston County Health District company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Maternal & Infant Health Consulting nor Galveston County Health District holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Maternal & Infant Health Consulting company nor Galveston County Health District company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Galveston County Health District company employs more people globally than Maternal & Infant Health Consulting company, reflecting its scale as a Public Health.

Neither Maternal & Infant Health Consulting nor Galveston County Health District holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Maternal & Infant Health Consulting nor Galveston County Health District holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Maternal & Infant Health Consulting nor Galveston County Health District holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Maternal & Infant Health Consulting nor Galveston County Health District holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Maternal & Infant Health Consulting nor Galveston County Health District holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Maternal & Infant Health Consulting nor Galveston County Health District holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H