Comparison Overview

M&M Printed Bag, Inc.

VS

Professional Printing Center

M&M Printed Bag, Inc.

5651 Kimball Ct, Chino, California, 91710, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.mmprintedbag.com/

At M&M Printed Bag, Inc. our Plastic Bags product line is diverse and designed to meet the specific needs of various sectors. In addition to our standard plastic bags, we also provide specialty bags tailored to specific industry needs. These include anti-static bags, tamper-evident bags, biohazard bags, and more. These specialized bags are designed to address unique packaging challenges and ensure the safety and security of the contents.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Professional Printing Center

817 Yupo Court, Chesapeake, Virginia, 23320, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799
http://professionalprinting.com

Professional Printing is a full service commercial color print shop located in Chesapeake, Virginia serving all of Hampton Roads to Richmond and the Outer Banks of North Carolina. For over 40 years these professionals have been serving our area corporate clients, providing them with economical, high quality, multicolor conventional and digital printing. A modern pressroom facility, housing our Komori, Heidelberg, and HP Indigo multicolor presses makes enhancing your company's true colors a quick economical task. State-of-the-art Electronic Prepress Systems allows us to offer you affordable process color printing as well as variable digital printing. A palette of services such as computer graphics, wide format printing, die cutting, foiling and embossing, mailing, inserting, and fulfillment will make your printed piece as unique as your business. We pride ourselves in capturing brilliance permanently and precisely.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 34
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/m&m-printed-bag-inc.jpeg
M&M Printed Bag, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/professional-printing-center.jpeg
Professional Printing Center
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
M&M Printed Bag, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Professional Printing Center
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for M&M Printed Bag, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Professional Printing Center in 2025.

Incident History — M&M Printed Bag, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

M&M Printed Bag, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Professional Printing Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Professional Printing Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/m&m-printed-bag-inc.jpeg
M&M Printed Bag, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/professional-printing-center.jpeg
Professional Printing Center
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

M&M Printed Bag, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Professional Printing Center company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Professional Printing Center company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to M&M Printed Bag, Inc. company.

In the current year, Professional Printing Center company and M&M Printed Bag, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Professional Printing Center company nor M&M Printed Bag, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Professional Printing Center company nor M&M Printed Bag, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Professional Printing Center company nor M&M Printed Bag, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither M&M Printed Bag, Inc. company nor Professional Printing Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither M&M Printed Bag, Inc. nor Professional Printing Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither M&M Printed Bag, Inc. company nor Professional Printing Center company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Professional Printing Center company employs more people globally than M&M Printed Bag, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither M&M Printed Bag, Inc. nor Professional Printing Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither M&M Printed Bag, Inc. nor Professional Printing Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither M&M Printed Bag, Inc. nor Professional Printing Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither M&M Printed Bag, Inc. nor Professional Printing Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither M&M Printed Bag, Inc. nor Professional Printing Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither M&M Printed Bag, Inc. nor Professional Printing Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References