Comparison Overview

Lyric Opera of Chicago

VS

Atlanta Symphony Orchestra

Lyric Opera of Chicago

20 N Wacker Drive, Chicago, IL, 60606, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Lyric Opera of Chicago, founded in 1954, is one of the world's greatest opera companies. It is renowned internationally for its artistic excellence and financial strength. Over the past two decades the company has achieved unparalleled success in its ticket sales, averaging 100% attendance from 1988-2002. Lyric Opera is also distinguished for having operated in the black for 20 of the past 21 years.

NAICS: 7111
NAICS Definition: Performing Arts Companies
Employees: 505
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Atlanta Symphony Orchestra

1280 Peachtree Street NE, Atlanta, GA, 30309, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

Established in 1945, the Atlanta Symphony Orchestra continues to affirm its position as one of America’s leading orchestras with excellent live performances, renowned guest artist features and engaging education initiatives. As a cornerstone for artistic development in the Southeast, the Atlanta Symphony Orchestra performs a full schedule of more than 150 concerts, including educational and community concerts, each year for a combined audience of more than half a million. To learn more, visit www.aso.org.

NAICS: 7111
NAICS Definition: Performing Arts Companies
Employees: 218
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lyric-opera-of-chicago.jpeg
Lyric Opera of Chicago
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/atlanta-symphony-orchestra.jpeg
Atlanta Symphony Orchestra
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Lyric Opera of Chicago
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Atlanta Symphony Orchestra
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lyric Opera of Chicago in 2025.

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Atlanta Symphony Orchestra in 2025.

Incident History — Lyric Opera of Chicago (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lyric Opera of Chicago cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Atlanta Symphony Orchestra (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Atlanta Symphony Orchestra cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lyric-opera-of-chicago.jpeg
Lyric Opera of Chicago
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/atlanta-symphony-orchestra.jpeg
Atlanta Symphony Orchestra
Incidents

Date Detected: 04/2019
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Lyric Opera of Chicago company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Atlanta Symphony Orchestra company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Atlanta Symphony Orchestra company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Lyric Opera of Chicago company has not reported any.

In the current year, Atlanta Symphony Orchestra company and Lyric Opera of Chicago company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Atlanta Symphony Orchestra company nor Lyric Opera of Chicago company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Atlanta Symphony Orchestra company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Lyric Opera of Chicago company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Atlanta Symphony Orchestra company nor Lyric Opera of Chicago company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Lyric Opera of Chicago company nor Atlanta Symphony Orchestra company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Lyric Opera of Chicago nor Atlanta Symphony Orchestra holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Atlanta Symphony Orchestra company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Lyric Opera of Chicago company.

Lyric Opera of Chicago company employs more people globally than Atlanta Symphony Orchestra company, reflecting its scale as a Performing Arts.

Neither Lyric Opera of Chicago nor Atlanta Symphony Orchestra holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Lyric Opera of Chicago nor Atlanta Symphony Orchestra holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Lyric Opera of Chicago nor Atlanta Symphony Orchestra holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Lyric Opera of Chicago nor Atlanta Symphony Orchestra holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Lyric Opera of Chicago nor Atlanta Symphony Orchestra holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Lyric Opera of Chicago nor Atlanta Symphony Orchestra holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N