Comparison Overview

Lyric Opera of Chicago

VS

1687, Inc

Lyric Opera of Chicago

20 N Wacker Drive, Chicago, IL, 60606, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.lyricopera.org

Lyric Opera of Chicago, founded in 1954, is one of the world's greatest opera companies. It is renowned internationally for its artistic excellence and financial strength. Over the past two decades the company has achieved unparalleled success in its ticket sales, averaging 100% attendance from 1988-2002. Lyric Opera is also distinguished for having operated in the black for 20 of the past 21 years.

NAICS: 7111
NAICS Definition: Performing Arts Companies
Employees: 505
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

1687, Inc

PO Box 1000, New York, NY, 10014, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799
http://www.1687.org

Our mission is to support the work of Lenore Von Stein and Company in their efforts to create music and art that stretches the possibilities of expression and encourages creative thinking. We are also endeavoring to build an ethical, democratic organization in which artists are free to create and present work without interference or commercial compromises.

NAICS: 711
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lyric-opera-of-chicago.jpeg
Lyric Opera of Chicago
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/1687-inc.jpeg
1687, Inc
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Lyric Opera of Chicago
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
1687, Inc
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lyric Opera of Chicago in 2025.

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for 1687, Inc in 2025.

Incident History — Lyric Opera of Chicago (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lyric Opera of Chicago cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — 1687, Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

1687, Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lyric-opera-of-chicago.jpeg
Lyric Opera of Chicago
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/1687-inc.jpeg
1687, Inc
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Lyric Opera of Chicago company and 1687, Inc company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, 1687, Inc company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Lyric Opera of Chicago company.

In the current year, 1687, Inc company and Lyric Opera of Chicago company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither 1687, Inc company nor Lyric Opera of Chicago company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither 1687, Inc company nor Lyric Opera of Chicago company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither 1687, Inc company nor Lyric Opera of Chicago company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Lyric Opera of Chicago company nor 1687, Inc company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Lyric Opera of Chicago nor 1687, Inc holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Lyric Opera of Chicago company nor 1687, Inc company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Lyric Opera of Chicago company employs more people globally than 1687, Inc company, reflecting its scale as a Performing Arts.

Neither Lyric Opera of Chicago nor 1687, Inc holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Lyric Opera of Chicago nor 1687, Inc holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Lyric Opera of Chicago nor 1687, Inc holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Lyric Opera of Chicago nor 1687, Inc holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Lyric Opera of Chicago nor 1687, Inc holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Lyric Opera of Chicago nor 1687, Inc holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References