Comparison Overview

Lynx & Co

VS

TigerTiger Graphics LLP

Lynx & Co

1516 N 5th St, Philadelphia, 19122, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03

Kim Lincon started Lynx & Co in 2009 back in the suburbs of NYC. In 2012, she relocated the business to Philadelphia and expanded to a full-service design studio. Lynx & Co a multi-dimensional, women-operated design studio. They are pathfinders and progressive design thinkers. Their mission is to deliver clarity, direction and distinctive design for brands who want to stand out and step it up. Lynx & Co helps brands reimagine and redefine industries while leading consumers to imaginative experiences. We collaborate with businesses of all types and sizes to create adaptable solutions with lasting value.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

TigerTiger Graphics LLP

172 5th Main Road, Defence Colony, Indiranagar, 1/f, Bangalore, KA, IN, 560038
Last Update: 2025-12-03

TigerTiger Graphics provides art-quality, hi resolution imagery for corporate, hospitality, health care and other commercial spaces. We provide an end to end solution - from tens of thousands of high end images, to site inspection, printing and installation. We currently serve India, Sri Lanka, Singapore, Malaysia and Maldives. Our retail brands, Image India, Image Sri Lanka, Image Asia and Image Maldives provides packaged, country-specific retail images aimed at the tourist industry, and are sold through hotels and resorts across the region

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lynx-&-co.jpeg
Lynx & Co
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tigertiger-graphics.jpeg
TigerTiger Graphics LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Lynx & Co
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
TigerTiger Graphics LLP
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lynx & Co in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TigerTiger Graphics LLP in 2025.

Incident History — Lynx & Co (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lynx & Co cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — TigerTiger Graphics LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TigerTiger Graphics LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lynx-&-co.jpeg
Lynx & Co
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tigertiger-graphics.jpeg
TigerTiger Graphics LLP
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

TigerTiger Graphics LLP company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Lynx & Co company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, TigerTiger Graphics LLP company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Lynx & Co company.

In the current year, TigerTiger Graphics LLP company and Lynx & Co company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither TigerTiger Graphics LLP company nor Lynx & Co company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither TigerTiger Graphics LLP company nor Lynx & Co company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither TigerTiger Graphics LLP company nor Lynx & Co company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Lynx & Co company nor TigerTiger Graphics LLP company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Lynx & Co nor TigerTiger Graphics LLP holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Lynx & Co company nor TigerTiger Graphics LLP company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Lynx & Co company employs more people globally than TigerTiger Graphics LLP company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither Lynx & Co nor TigerTiger Graphics LLP holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Lynx & Co nor TigerTiger Graphics LLP holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Lynx & Co nor TigerTiger Graphics LLP holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Lynx & Co nor TigerTiger Graphics LLP holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Lynx & Co nor TigerTiger Graphics LLP holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Lynx & Co nor TigerTiger Graphics LLP holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X