Comparison Overview

Lynx & Co

VS

deZinnia

Lynx & Co

1516 N 5th St, Philadelphia, 19122, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03

Kim Lincon started Lynx & Co in 2009 back in the suburbs of NYC. In 2012, she relocated the business to Philadelphia and expanded to a full-service design studio. Lynx & Co a multi-dimensional, women-operated design studio. They are pathfinders and progressive design thinkers. Their mission is to deliver clarity, direction and distinctive design for brands who want to stand out and step it up. Lynx & Co helps brands reimagine and redefine industries while leading consumers to imaginative experiences. We collaborate with businesses of all types and sizes to create adaptable solutions with lasting value.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

deZinnia

1032 West Seventh St., St. Paul, MN, 55102, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 700 and 749

Since 1992, we've been integrating great design and brilliant project management to deliver highly effective graphic, packaging and production work. We ensure critical safety, regulatory, usability and manufacturing requirements are upheld to achieve exceptional packaging. Our process and in-house artwork management tool allow us to remove the inefficiencies and barriers our clients routinely face, enhance quality, and provide real-time visibility to every detail of the project cycle including: project status, deadlines, revisions, approvals and spend. We take pride in our attention to details to manage complexity and streamline communication.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lynx-&-co.jpeg
Lynx & Co
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dezinnia-inc..jpeg
deZinnia
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Lynx & Co
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
deZinnia
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lynx & Co in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for deZinnia in 2025.

Incident History — Lynx & Co (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lynx & Co cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — deZinnia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

deZinnia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lynx-&-co.jpeg
Lynx & Co
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dezinnia-inc..jpeg
deZinnia
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Lynx & Co company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to deZinnia company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, deZinnia company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Lynx & Co company.

In the current year, deZinnia company and Lynx & Co company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither deZinnia company nor Lynx & Co company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither deZinnia company nor Lynx & Co company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither deZinnia company nor Lynx & Co company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Lynx & Co company nor deZinnia company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Lynx & Co nor deZinnia holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Lynx & Co company nor deZinnia company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

deZinnia company employs more people globally than Lynx & Co company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither Lynx & Co nor deZinnia holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Lynx & Co nor deZinnia holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Lynx & Co nor deZinnia holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Lynx & Co nor deZinnia holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Lynx & Co nor deZinnia holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Lynx & Co nor deZinnia holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X