Comparison Overview

Lynch Meyer Lawyers

VS

McTigue & Colombo LLC

Lynch Meyer Lawyers

190 Flinders Street, Adelaide, South Australia, 5000, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Lynch Meyer Lawyers are a leading commercial law firm based in Adelaide, South Australia. We offer specialist advice to key South Australian, national and international industries. Our vision is to deliver exceptional service and outcomes to all of our clients all of the time. We pride ourselves on offering all our clients practical, commercial legal advice and first-rate service.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 47
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

McTigue & Colombo LLC

545 E Town St, Columbus, Ohio, 43215, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Since its inception, the Firm has concentrated in the field of election and campaign finance law. Our clients include candidates for public office, political action committees, ballot issue groups, corporations, labor organizations, lobbyists, public officials, and governmental bodies across Ohio and nationally. We assist clients with compliance with federal and state campaign finance and election laws, local and statewide ballot initiatives and referenda, voting rights, and all other matters involving elections and participation in the political process. We have represented clients in numerous election-related cases before federal and state trial and appellate courts, and before federal and state administrative agencies. The Firm serves clients in the areas of Election Law & Ballot Access, Campaign Finance Reporting, and Government & Public Affairs Law.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lynch-meyer-lawyers.jpeg
Lynch Meyer Lawyers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/electionlawgroup.jpeg
McTigue & Colombo LLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Lynch Meyer Lawyers
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
McTigue & Colombo LLC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lynch Meyer Lawyers in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for McTigue & Colombo LLC in 2025.

Incident History — Lynch Meyer Lawyers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lynch Meyer Lawyers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — McTigue & Colombo LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

McTigue & Colombo LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lynch-meyer-lawyers.jpeg
Lynch Meyer Lawyers
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/electionlawgroup.jpeg
McTigue & Colombo LLC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

McTigue & Colombo LLC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Lynch Meyer Lawyers company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, McTigue & Colombo LLC company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Lynch Meyer Lawyers company.

In the current year, McTigue & Colombo LLC company and Lynch Meyer Lawyers company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither McTigue & Colombo LLC company nor Lynch Meyer Lawyers company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither McTigue & Colombo LLC company nor Lynch Meyer Lawyers company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither McTigue & Colombo LLC company nor Lynch Meyer Lawyers company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Lynch Meyer Lawyers company nor McTigue & Colombo LLC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Lynch Meyer Lawyers nor McTigue & Colombo LLC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Lynch Meyer Lawyers company nor McTigue & Colombo LLC company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Lynch Meyer Lawyers company employs more people globally than McTigue & Colombo LLC company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Lynch Meyer Lawyers nor McTigue & Colombo LLC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Lynch Meyer Lawyers nor McTigue & Colombo LLC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Lynch Meyer Lawyers nor McTigue & Colombo LLC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Lynch Meyer Lawyers nor McTigue & Colombo LLC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Lynch Meyer Lawyers nor McTigue & Colombo LLC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Lynch Meyer Lawyers nor McTigue & Colombo LLC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X