Comparison Overview

LYF

VS

Momentum Health Group

LYF

undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

LYF: Listen, Learn, Empower. LYF is a company dedicated to empowering young people to push back on shame. We believe that everyone deserves to feel good about themselves, and we want to help young people develop the tools they need to overcome the negative thoughts and feelings that can hold them back. We offer a variety of programs and services designed to help young people build self-esteem, manage their emotions, and develop healthy relationships. Our programs are led by experienced coaches who are passionate about helping young people reach their full potential. We believe that everyone has something to offer, and we want to help young people find their voice and use it to make a difference in the world. We are committed to creating a safe and supportive space where young people can feel comfortable sharing their thoughts and feelings. If you are a young person who is struggling with shame, we encourage you to reach out to us. We are here to help. Here are some of the ways we can help: One-on-one coaching: Our coaches can provide individual support to help you develop the skills you need to overcome shame. Group coaching: Our group coaching programs offer a supportive environment where you can learn from and connect with other young people who are also struggling with shame. Online resources: We offer a variety of online resources, including articles, videos, and worksheets, that can help you learn more about shame and how to overcome it. If you are interested in learning more about LYF, please contact us today.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 142
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Momentum Health Group

170 Meeting St, Suite 110, Charleston, South Carolina, US, 29401
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Welcome to Momentum Health Group, where we provide personalized care for individuals on their journey to improved mental wellness. Led by Victoria Nieman, a licensed clinical professional counselor with over seven years of experience, our practice is committed to empowering individuals through personalized, compassionate care. Momentum strives to help clients navigate and overcome Depression, Anxiety, Life Transitions and Stress, Low Self-Esteem/Confidence, Relationship Issues, Work Issues and Trauma. At Momentum Health Group, we believe in fostering a safe and supportive environment where clients can explore their challenges, build resilience, and achieve their fullest potential. Our mission is to guide you towards mental wellness with empathy, authenticity, and self acceptance. Let's work together to unlock your potential and unleash your momentum towards a brighter future. Your journey to wellness starts with Momentum.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lyf.jpeg
LYF
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/momentum-health-group-counseling.jpeg
Momentum Health Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
LYF
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Momentum Health Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LYF in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Momentum Health Group in 2026.

Incident History — LYF (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LYF cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Momentum Health Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Momentum Health Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lyf.jpeg
LYF
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/momentum-health-group-counseling.jpeg
Momentum Health Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

LYF company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Momentum Health Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Momentum Health Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to LYF company.

In the current year, Momentum Health Group company and LYF company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Momentum Health Group company nor LYF company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Momentum Health Group company nor LYF company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Momentum Health Group company nor LYF company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither LYF company nor Momentum Health Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither LYF nor Momentum Health Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither LYF company nor Momentum Health Group company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

LYF company employs more people globally than Momentum Health Group company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither LYF nor Momentum Health Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither LYF nor Momentum Health Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither LYF nor Momentum Health Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither LYF nor Momentum Health Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither LYF nor Momentum Health Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither LYF nor Momentum Health Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N