Comparison Overview

Lyciar

VS

Camera dei deputati

Lyciar

Murtala Courts, Kampala, UG
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

How do we analyse infrastructure investment? Step back. Look at the policy space. It is a dynamical system comprising the state, society and market (SSM). Focus on Africa: Within this SSM space, infrastructure investment is tethered to debt and the potential in public-private partnerships (PPP). These three define our work. We study the dynamics of the three, and the excitation of the fourth industrial revolution (4IR). We work with universities in Africa and overseas. That rigour of pursuit guides our advice to governments, funding and financing entities, and asset managers.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Camera dei deputati

Piazza di Monte Citorio, Roma, 00186, IT
Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 750 and 799

La Costituzione italiana stabilisce che la sovranità appartiene al popolo, cioè a tutti i cittadini, che la esercitano nelle forme e nei limiti che la Costituzione stessa indica. Una delle più importanti forme di espressione della sovranità popolare è l'elezione del Parlamento. Il Parlamento è composto dalla Camera dei deputati e dal Senato della Repubblica. Il Parlamento è un'Istituzione centrale nel nostro sistema costituzionale. Esso infatti approva le leggi, indirizza e controlla l'attività del Governo, svolge attività d’inchiesta su materie di pubblico interesse, concede e revoca la fiducia al Governo; inoltre il Parlamento in seduta comune, integrato dai delegati regionali, elegge il Presidente della Repubblica; infine il Parlamento in seduta comune elegge una parte dei giudici della Corte costituzionale e dei componenti del Consiglio superiore della magistratura.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 1,481
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lyciar.jpeg
Lyciar
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/camera-dei-deputati.jpeg
Camera dei deputati
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Lyciar
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Camera dei deputati
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lyciar in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Camera dei deputati in 2025.

Incident History — Lyciar (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lyciar cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Camera dei deputati (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Camera dei deputati cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lyciar.jpeg
Lyciar
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/camera-dei-deputati.jpeg
Camera dei deputati
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Lyciar company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Camera dei deputati company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Camera dei deputati company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Lyciar company.

In the current year, Camera dei deputati company and Lyciar company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Camera dei deputati company nor Lyciar company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Camera dei deputati company nor Lyciar company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Camera dei deputati company nor Lyciar company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Lyciar company nor Camera dei deputati company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Lyciar nor Camera dei deputati holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Lyciar company nor Camera dei deputati company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Camera dei deputati company employs more people globally than Lyciar company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither Lyciar nor Camera dei deputati holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Lyciar nor Camera dei deputati holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Lyciar nor Camera dei deputati holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Lyciar nor Camera dei deputati holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Lyciar nor Camera dei deputati holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Lyciar nor Camera dei deputati holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H