Comparison Overview

Luxury Daily

VS

The Food Institute

Luxury Daily

New York, us
Last Update: 2026-01-21
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.luxurydaily.com

Founded in 2010, Luxury Daily offers an insider’s view of the luxury landscape, unpacking the unique challenges and conditions of an ever-evolving market with breaking news, expert analysis, accredited research, in-depth features and thought-provoking opinion pieces. Operating at the intersection of commerce and lifestyle, Luxury Daily serves as a trusted resource for executives and enthusiasts seeking up-to-date coverage on the innovations shaping the industry. Disrupting the pace of media with balanced takes on brand strategy, consumer behavior and current events, the leading online publication arms its global audience with the stories that matter. Available each and every business day, a team of journalists, experts and contributors deliver content that informs and sparks impact across a curated set of sectors including apparel and accessories, automotive, beauty, travel and hospitality, real estate and more via site and newsletter. Whether a marketing professional, sales specialist, retailer, investor or simply someone with a passion for the field, Luxury Daily is the go-to destination for understanding the trends driving today’s tastemaker.

NAICS: 5191311
NAICS Definition: Internet Publishing and Broadcasting and Web Search Portals
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

The Food Institute

330 Changebridge Road, Pine Brook, NJ, 07058, US
Last Update: 2026-01-21
Between 750 and 799
http://www.foodinstitute.com

The Food Institute delivers reliable news and insights on the food industry - from farm to fork - in one place. Since 1928, The Food Institute has provided food and beverage business news, data, and trends to help members make informed decisions on what's happening right now. Visit our website for all that The Food Institute has to offer.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 62
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/luxury-daily.jpeg
Luxury Daily
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-food-institute.jpeg
The Food Institute
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Luxury Daily
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Food Institute
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Internet News Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Luxury Daily in 2026.

Incidents vs Internet News Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Food Institute in 2026.

Incident History — Luxury Daily (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Luxury Daily cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Food Institute (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Food Institute cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/luxury-daily.jpeg
Luxury Daily
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-food-institute.jpeg
The Food Institute
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Food Institute company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Luxury Daily company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Food Institute company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Luxury Daily company.

In the current year, The Food Institute company and Luxury Daily company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Food Institute company nor Luxury Daily company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Food Institute company nor Luxury Daily company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Food Institute company nor Luxury Daily company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Luxury Daily company nor The Food Institute company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Luxury Daily nor The Food Institute holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Luxury Daily company nor The Food Institute company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Food Institute company employs more people globally than Luxury Daily company, reflecting its scale as a Internet News.

Neither Luxury Daily nor The Food Institute holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Luxury Daily nor The Food Institute holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Luxury Daily nor The Food Institute holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Luxury Daily nor The Food Institute holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Luxury Daily nor The Food Institute holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Luxury Daily nor The Food Institute holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References