Comparison Overview

Lutheran Social Services of the National Capital Area

VS

Cogent Thinking

Lutheran Social Services of the National Capital Area

1730 Rhode Island Ave NW, Washington, District of Columbia, 20036, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://LSSNCA.org

Since 1917, Lutheran Social Services of the National Capital Area (LSSNCA), a human services and immigration relief and refugee welcome agency, has accompanied those in need throughout Maryland, Virginia, and Washington, D.C. to foster resiliency, self-sufficiency, and access to opportunities. We provide services that last beyond just the initial arrival for families, youth, children, and individuals rebuilding their lives in the D.C. metro area. LSSNCA is accredited by COA Accreditation, a service of Social Current. Motivated daily by our belief in the inherent dignity of all, LSSNCA’s innovative participant-informed programs serve refugees, forced migrants, immigrants, children and youth, and underserved communities by filling in the gaps. Piloting initiatives like the area’s first camp for kids impacted by the HIV/AIDS crisis, originating local pro se asylum workshops for Afghan Allies, launching a Resource Center to serve as a community hub for all recently arrived program participants, and offering myriad trauma-informed mental health support services, LSSNCA strives to create an inclusive community of well-being where people thrive.

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 219
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Cogent Thinking

North Tower, Level 3, 485 La Trobe Street, Melbourne, Victoria, 3000, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799
http://www.cogentthinking.com.au

Cogent Thinking (Cogent) is Australia’s premiere provider in Injury Prevention, Incident Response (24/7 triage), Medical Management, Return to Work and Claims Administration. As part of MedHealth, we bring together over 2200 health, employment and support services professionals across 80+ locations in Australia, backed by the expertise of more than 1,200 independent medical specialists. In a climate where safety is paramount and increasingly more confusing, Cogent provides tailored and practical solutions promoting Injury prevention and response, while unraveling the complexities associated with injury management, claims management and administration across all jurisdictions. We look at the ‘big picture’ and it is through this holistic approach that we develop partnerships enabling us to introduce a series of best practice initiatives to our customers, supporting and enhancing their current Health and Safety program. Cogent customers find comfort in the advice provided by our expert team of Allied Health and Return to Work professionals, with qualifications across; Psychology, Physiotherapy, Occupational Therapy, Nursing and Exercise Physiology. In addition to the Cogent team, customers will have access to a National treating practitioner network, who believe in the health benefits associated with return to at work. Though this style of collaboration, Cogent provides a greater level of control in mitigating injuries from progressing to claim and has a proven track record in reducing; claim lodgement, duration, expenditure and premium. In addition to this, our integrated approach has allowed us to drive positive cultural change within organisations relating to prevention, reporting and support in the workplace.

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 46
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cogent-thinking.jpeg
Cogent Thinking
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Lutheran Social Services of the National Capital Area
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Cogent Thinking
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lutheran Social Services of the National Capital Area in 2025.

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cogent Thinking in 2025.

Incident History — Lutheran Social Services of the National Capital Area (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lutheran Social Services of the National Capital Area cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Cogent Thinking (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cogent Thinking cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lutheran-social-services-of-the-national-capital-area.jpeg
Lutheran Social Services of the National Capital Area
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cogent-thinking.jpeg
Cogent Thinking
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Lutheran Social Services of the National Capital Area company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Cogent Thinking company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Cogent Thinking company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Lutheran Social Services of the National Capital Area company.

In the current year, Cogent Thinking company and Lutheran Social Services of the National Capital Area company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Cogent Thinking company nor Lutheran Social Services of the National Capital Area company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Cogent Thinking company nor Lutheran Social Services of the National Capital Area company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Cogent Thinking company nor Lutheran Social Services of the National Capital Area company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Lutheran Social Services of the National Capital Area company nor Cogent Thinking company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Lutheran Social Services of the National Capital Area nor Cogent Thinking holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Lutheran Social Services of the National Capital Area company nor Cogent Thinking company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Lutheran Social Services of the National Capital Area company employs more people globally than Cogent Thinking company, reflecting its scale as a Health and Human Services.

Neither Lutheran Social Services of the National Capital Area nor Cogent Thinking holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Lutheran Social Services of the National Capital Area nor Cogent Thinking holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Lutheran Social Services of the National Capital Area nor Cogent Thinking holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Lutheran Social Services of the National Capital Area nor Cogent Thinking holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Lutheran Social Services of the National Capital Area nor Cogent Thinking holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Lutheran Social Services of the National Capital Area nor Cogent Thinking holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References