Comparison Overview

LURA Consulting

VS

Arizona Tax Research Association

LURA Consulting

None
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

As leaders in collaborative community sustainability planning, Lura has partnered with public agencies and their communities to achieve economic, environmental and community prosperity for present and future generations. For over 30 years, we have worked with governments, their partners, stakeholders, and communities to develop collaborative policies, plans and programs. Lura’s key strength is our ability to develop strong processes, and provide the essential scientific and technical basis that enables Lura, and the communities we work with to analyse and link community, economic, and environmental values, and create the common ground. This big picture approach to planning enables municipal leaders to easily move plans and projects forward. Every year, Lura delivers hundreds of projects for municipal, provincial, national and international clients. For every project, we are committed to ensuring our team provides the upmost in terms of excellence in project design and delivery, quality, and service. We have a solid reputation amongst our clients for going above and beyond the specifications of our commitments to ensure that our clients and their communities are proud of the plans we develop together.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 25
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Arizona Tax Research Association

1814 W. Washington, Phoenix, AZ, 85007, US
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 700 and 749

The Arizona Tax Research Association (ATRA) is the only statewide taxpayer organization representing a cross section of Arizona individuals and businesses. Organized in 1940, ATRA is the largest and most respected independent and accurate source of public finance and tax policy information. ATRA represents taxpayers before policy makers at the state and local level. ATRA's fundamental belief is that every governmental expenditure is directly related to a tax. ATRA's goal is efficient statewide government and the effective use of tax dollars through sound fiscal policies.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lura-consulting.jpeg
LURA Consulting
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arizona-tax-research.jpeg
Arizona Tax Research Association
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
LURA Consulting
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Arizona Tax Research Association
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LURA Consulting in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Arizona Tax Research Association in 2025.

Incident History — LURA Consulting (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LURA Consulting cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Arizona Tax Research Association (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Arizona Tax Research Association cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lura-consulting.jpeg
LURA Consulting
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arizona-tax-research.jpeg
Arizona Tax Research Association
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Arizona Tax Research Association company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to LURA Consulting company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Arizona Tax Research Association company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to LURA Consulting company.

In the current year, Arizona Tax Research Association company and LURA Consulting company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Arizona Tax Research Association company nor LURA Consulting company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Arizona Tax Research Association company nor LURA Consulting company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Arizona Tax Research Association company nor LURA Consulting company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither LURA Consulting company nor Arizona Tax Research Association company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither LURA Consulting nor Arizona Tax Research Association holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither LURA Consulting company nor Arizona Tax Research Association company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

LURA Consulting company employs more people globally than Arizona Tax Research Association company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither LURA Consulting nor Arizona Tax Research Association holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither LURA Consulting nor Arizona Tax Research Association holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither LURA Consulting nor Arizona Tax Research Association holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither LURA Consulting nor Arizona Tax Research Association holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither LURA Consulting nor Arizona Tax Research Association holds HIPAA certification.

Neither LURA Consulting nor Arizona Tax Research Association holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H