Comparison Overview

Luna Technologies

VS

Smart Traffic Systems

Luna Technologies

866 N Columbia Blvd, Ste B103, Portland, Oregon, 97217, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Luna Technologies is a Portland-based cannabis extraction equipment manufacturer that develops fully automated hydrocarbon extraction equipment. The Luna team, fueled by backgrounds in aerospace engineering, large-scale cannabis cultivation, and pharmaceutical engineering, aimed to create the world’s most advanced extractor: the IO Extractor. The IO has set the industry standard for safety, efficiency, and ease of use, reducing risk of operator error with a simple touchscreen interface and reducing noxious emissions compared with competing extractors.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Smart Traffic Systems

79 Station Rd, Seven Hills, New South Wales, 2147, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-26

Smart Traffic Systems is a proud representative of the German brand MSR Traffic which specialises in manufacturing of SMART TRAFFIC AND PARKING GUIDANCE SYSTEMS. We provide innovative indoor and outdoor car park solutions using ultrasonic and magnetic field sensors which guides commuters to the nearest available parking spot using modern LED signage systems.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lunatechnologies.jpeg
Luna Technologies
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/smart-traffic-systems.jpeg
Smart Traffic Systems
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Luna Technologies
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Smart Traffic Systems
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Luna Technologies in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Smart Traffic Systems in 2025.

Incident History — Luna Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Luna Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Smart Traffic Systems (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Smart Traffic Systems cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lunatechnologies.jpeg
Luna Technologies
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/smart-traffic-systems.jpeg
Smart Traffic Systems
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Luna Technologies company and Smart Traffic Systems company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Smart Traffic Systems company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Luna Technologies company.

In the current year, Smart Traffic Systems company and Luna Technologies company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Smart Traffic Systems company nor Luna Technologies company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Smart Traffic Systems company nor Luna Technologies company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Smart Traffic Systems company nor Luna Technologies company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Luna Technologies company nor Smart Traffic Systems company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Luna Technologies nor Smart Traffic Systems holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Luna Technologies company nor Smart Traffic Systems company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Luna Technologies company employs more people globally than Smart Traffic Systems company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Automation.

Neither Luna Technologies nor Smart Traffic Systems holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Luna Technologies nor Smart Traffic Systems holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Luna Technologies nor Smart Traffic Systems holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Luna Technologies nor Smart Traffic Systems holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Luna Technologies nor Smart Traffic Systems holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Luna Technologies nor Smart Traffic Systems holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H