Comparison Overview

Luma Optics, Inc.

VS

BIT Mining Limited

Luma Optics, Inc.

125 South Main Street, Suite 108, Sebastopol, CA, US, 95472
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

LUMA Optics is a single-source manufacturer of optical transceivers compatible with top network equipment platforms. Our products are designed to enable multi-vendor network links while reducing network operators' CapEx and OpEx spend. With 30,000 systems and over 500,000 units installed, Luma Optics is known industry-wide for product quality, quick delivery, and outstanding customer support.

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

BIT Mining Limited

Cyberport 3, 100 Cyberport Road, Units 813 & 815, Level 8, Core F, Hong Kong, None, HK, None
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 700 and 749

BIT Mining (NYSE: BTCM) is a leading technology-driven cryptocurrency mining company, with a long-term strategy to create value across the cryptocurrency industry. Its business covers cryptocurrency mining, mining pool, and data center operation. The Company owns the world's top blockchain browser BTC.com and the comprehensive mining pool business operated under BTC.com, providing multi-currency mining services including BTC, ETH and LTC. The Company has also entered into a definitive agreement to acquire a 7-nanometer cryptocurrency mining machine manufacturer, Bee Computing, to complete the Company's vertical integration with its supply chain, increase its self-sufficiency and strengthen its competitive position.

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/luma-optics-inc-.jpeg
Luma Optics, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/比特矿业.jpeg
BIT Mining Limited
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Luma Optics, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
BIT Mining Limited
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Luma Optics, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BIT Mining Limited in 2025.

Incident History — Luma Optics, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Luma Optics, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — BIT Mining Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BIT Mining Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/luma-optics-inc-.jpeg
Luma Optics, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/比特矿业.jpeg
BIT Mining Limited
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Luma Optics, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to BIT Mining Limited company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, BIT Mining Limited company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Luma Optics, Inc. company.

In the current year, BIT Mining Limited company and Luma Optics, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither BIT Mining Limited company nor Luma Optics, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither BIT Mining Limited company nor Luma Optics, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither BIT Mining Limited company nor Luma Optics, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Luma Optics, Inc. company nor BIT Mining Limited company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Luma Optics, Inc. nor BIT Mining Limited holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Luma Optics, Inc. company nor BIT Mining Limited company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

BIT Mining Limited company employs more people globally than Luma Optics, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Networking Products.

Neither Luma Optics, Inc. nor BIT Mining Limited holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Luma Optics, Inc. nor BIT Mining Limited holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Luma Optics, Inc. nor BIT Mining Limited holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Luma Optics, Inc. nor BIT Mining Limited holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Luma Optics, Inc. nor BIT Mining Limited holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Luma Optics, Inc. nor BIT Mining Limited holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.