Comparison Overview

LuLu's

VS

Domino's

LuLu's

200 E. 25th Ave., Gulf Shores, AL, 36542, US
Last Update: 2025-03-10 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000

Excellent

Lucy Buffett's LuLu's is all about FUN! There are so many different elements that go into the experience at each of our restaurants- the fabulous food, great service, family-friendly environment, fun shopping, live music nightly, and waterfront ambiance- all in facilities designed to give you a taste of authentic Coastal Living. Our job is to make it look really easy and to give our customer permission to take a break from life for a while. Bottom line- it's all about food, fun and family!

NAICS: 722
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 447
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Domino's

30 Frank Lloyd Wright Dr, Ann Arbor, MI, 48106, US
Last Update: 2025-03-04 (UTC)

Excellent

Whatโ€™s behind one of the worldโ€™s top public restaurant brands? Fun and innovative franchise and corporate team members who are driven to win. Inspired to make each day better than the last, people may join for different reasons but what motivates them to stay are the passionate and talented colleagues who want Dominoโ€™s to be the best pizza company in every neighborhood. And, weโ€™re having fun doing it! Whether debuting technology firsts, like our voice-ordering iPhoneยฎ and Androidโ„ข apps, or creating delicious new menu items, weโ€™re dedicated to our customers and focused on making great pizza and more in approximately 17,100 stores in 90+ markets around the world. A lot has happened since Dominoโ€™s was founded in 1960, but the best part is that the brand is just getting started.

NAICS: 7225
NAICS Definition: Restaurants and Other Eating Places
Employees: 89,095
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lulu's.jpeg
LuLu's
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/domino's-pizza.jpeg
Domino's
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
LuLu's
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Domino's
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LuLu's in 2025.

Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Domino's in 2025.

Incident History โ€” LuLu's (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LuLu's cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Domino's (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Domino's cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lulu's.jpeg
LuLu's
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/domino's-pizza.jpeg
Domino's
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both LuLu's company and Domino's company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Domino's company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to LuLu's company.

In the current year, Domino's company and LuLu's company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Domino's company nor LuLu's company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Domino's company nor LuLu's company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Domino's company nor LuLu's company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither LuLu's company nor Domino's company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Domino's company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to LuLu's company.

Domino's company employs more people globally than LuLu's company, reflecting its scale as a Restaurants.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Formbricks is an open source qualtrics alternative. Prior to version 4.0.1, Formbricks is missing JWT signature verification. This vulnerability stems from a token validation routine that only decodes JWTs (jwt.decode) without verifying their signatures. Both the email verification token login path and the password reset server action use the same validator, which does not check the tokenโ€™s signature, expiration, issuer, or audience. If an attacker learns the victimโ€™s actual user.id, they can craft an arbitrary JWT with an alg: "none" header and use it to authenticate and reset the victimโ€™s password. This issue has been patched in version 4.0.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

Apollo Studio Embeddable Explorer & Embeddable Sandbox are website embeddable software solutions from Apollo GraphQL. Prior to Apollo Sandbox version 2.7.2 and Apollo Explorer version 3.7.3, a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability was identified. The vulnerability arises from missing origin validation in the client-side code that handles window.postMessage events. A malicious website can send forged messages to the embedding page, causing the victimโ€™s browser to execute arbitrary GraphQL queries or mutations against their GraphQL server while authenticated with the victimโ€™s cookies. This issue has been patched in Apollo Sandbox version 2.7.2 and Apollo Explorer version 3.7.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in Portabilis i-Educar up to 2.10. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /consulta-dispensas. Such manipulation leads to improper authorization. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A weakness has been identified in Portabilis i-Educar up to 2.10. Affected is an unknown function of the file /module/Api/aluno. This manipulation of the argument aluno_id causes improper authorization. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in Tencent WeKnora 0.1.0. This impacts the function testEmbeddingModel of the file /api/v1/initialization/embedding/test. The manipulation of the argument baseUrl results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. It is advisable to upgrade the affected component. The vendor responds: "We have confirmed that the issue mentioned in the report does not exist in the latest releases".

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X