Comparison Overview

LuLu's

VS

Chili's

LuLu's

200 E. 25th Ave., Gulf Shores, AL, 36542, US
Last Update: 2025-03-10 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000

Excellent

Lucy Buffett's LuLu's is all about FUN! There are so many different elements that go into the experience at each of our restaurants- the fabulous food, great service, family-friendly environment, fun shopping, live music nightly, and waterfront ambiance- all in facilities designed to give you a taste of authentic Coastal Living. Our job is to make it look really easy and to give our customer permission to take a break from life for a while. Bottom line- it's all about food, fun and family!

NAICS: 722
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 447
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Chili's

3000 Olympus Blvd, Dallas, Texas, 75019, US
Last Update: 2025-03-04 (UTC)

Excellent

Between 900 and 1000

Chili's opened as a fun Dallas burger joint with a loyalty to happy hour and blue jeans. We prided ourselves on our humble beginnings, following a devotion to great food, warm hospitality and community spirit. Today, with restaurants all over the world, we continue to cook up the best in casual fare, offering the same genuine service we did way back when. And, just as in 1975, we're committed to giving back to the communities that have helped us grow. Driven to perform? Insist on loving what you do? Then you have a lot in common with us. If youโ€™re passionate about delivering hospitality to every guest, every day, please visit us online today at ChilisJobs.com.

NAICS: 7225
NAICS Definition: Restaurants and Other Eating Places
Employees: 28,424
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lulu's.jpeg
LuLu's
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chili's.jpeg
Chili's
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
LuLu's
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Chili's
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LuLu's in 2025.

Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Chili's in 2025.

Incident History โ€” LuLu's (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LuLu's cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Chili's (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Chili's cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lulu's.jpeg
LuLu's
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chili's.jpeg
Chili's
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2018
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Both LuLu's company and Chili's company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Chili's company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas LuLu's company has not reported any.

In the current year, Chili's company and LuLu's company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Chili's company nor LuLu's company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Chili's company has disclosed at least one data breach, while LuLu's company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Chili's company nor LuLu's company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither LuLu's company nor Chili's company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Chili's company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to LuLu's company.

Chili's company employs more people globally than LuLu's company, reflecting its scale as a Restaurants.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Formbricks is an open source qualtrics alternative. Prior to version 4.0.1, Formbricks is missing JWT signature verification. This vulnerability stems from a token validation routine that only decodes JWTs (jwt.decode) without verifying their signatures. Both the email verification token login path and the password reset server action use the same validator, which does not check the tokenโ€™s signature, expiration, issuer, or audience. If an attacker learns the victimโ€™s actual user.id, they can craft an arbitrary JWT with an alg: "none" header and use it to authenticate and reset the victimโ€™s password. This issue has been patched in version 4.0.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

Apollo Studio Embeddable Explorer & Embeddable Sandbox are website embeddable software solutions from Apollo GraphQL. Prior to Apollo Sandbox version 2.7.2 and Apollo Explorer version 3.7.3, a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability was identified. The vulnerability arises from missing origin validation in the client-side code that handles window.postMessage events. A malicious website can send forged messages to the embedding page, causing the victimโ€™s browser to execute arbitrary GraphQL queries or mutations against their GraphQL server while authenticated with the victimโ€™s cookies. This issue has been patched in Apollo Sandbox version 2.7.2 and Apollo Explorer version 3.7.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in Portabilis i-Educar up to 2.10. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /consulta-dispensas. Such manipulation leads to improper authorization. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A weakness has been identified in Portabilis i-Educar up to 2.10. Affected is an unknown function of the file /module/Api/aluno. This manipulation of the argument aluno_id causes improper authorization. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in Tencent WeKnora 0.1.0. This impacts the function testEmbeddingModel of the file /api/v1/initialization/embedding/test. The manipulation of the argument baseUrl results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. It is advisable to upgrade the affected component. The vendor responds: "We have confirmed that the issue mentioned in the report does not exist in the latest releases".

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X