Comparison Overview

LuLu's

VS

Arby's

LuLu's

200 E. 25th Ave., Gulf Shores, AL, 36542, US
Last Update: 2025-03-10 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000

Excellent

Lucy Buffett's LuLu's is all about FUN! There are so many different elements that go into the experience at each of our restaurants- the fabulous food, great service, family-friendly environment, fun shopping, live music nightly, and waterfront ambiance- all in facilities designed to give you a taste of authentic Coastal Living. Our job is to make it look really easy and to give our customer permission to take a break from life for a while. Bottom line- it's all about food, fun and family!

NAICS: 722
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 447
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Arby's

3 Glenlake Pkwy NE, Atlanta, Georgia, 30328, US
Last Update: 2025-03-04 (UTC)

Excellent

Between 900 and 1000

Arbyโ€™s, founded in 1964, is the second-largest sandwich restaurant brand in the world with more than 3,400 restaurants in seven countries. Arbyโ€™s is part of the Inspire Brands family of restaurants. For more information, visit Arbys.com and InspireBrands.com With the current growth and momentum of the brand, Arbyโ€™s is actively seeking new franchisees. To learn more about available markets and requirements, visit ArbysFranchising.com

NAICS: 7225
NAICS Definition: Restaurants and Other Eating Places
Employees: 25,110
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lulu's.jpeg
LuLu's
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arby's.jpeg
Arby's
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
LuLu's
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Arby's
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LuLu's in 2025.

Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Arby's in 2025.

Incident History โ€” LuLu's (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LuLu's cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Arby's (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Arby's cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lulu's.jpeg
LuLu's
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arby's.jpeg
Arby's
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2017
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Malware
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 02/2017
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Point-of-Sale Systems
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2014
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Both LuLu's company and Arby's company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Arby's company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas LuLu's company has not reported any.

In the current year, Arby's company and LuLu's company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Arby's company nor LuLu's company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Arby's company has disclosed at least one data breach, while LuLu's company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Arby's company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while LuLu's company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither LuLu's company nor Arby's company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Arby's company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to LuLu's company.

Arby's company employs more people globally than LuLu's company, reflecting its scale as a Restaurants.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability has been found in GNU Binutils 2.45. The affected element is the function elf_swap_shdr in the library bfd/elfcode.h of the component Linker. The manipulation leads to heap-based buffer overflow. The attack must be carried out locally. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The identifier of the patch is 9ca499644a21ceb3f946d1c179c38a83be084490. To fix this issue, it is recommended to deploy a patch. The code maintainer replied with "[f]ixed for 2.46".

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in GNU Binutils 2.45. Impacted is the function _bfd_elf_parse_eh_frame of the file bfd/elf-eh-frame.c of the component Linker. Executing manipulation can lead to heap-based buffer overflow. The attack is restricted to local execution. The exploit has been published and may be used. This patch is called ea1a0737c7692737a644af0486b71e4a392cbca8. A patch should be applied to remediate this issue. The code maintainer replied with "[f]ixed for 2.46".

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was detected in GNU Binutils 2.45. This issue affects the function dump_dwarf_section of the file binutils/objdump.c. Performing manipulation results in out-of-bounds read. The attack is only possible with local access. The exploit is now public and may be used. The patch is named f87a66db645caf8cc0e6fc87b0c28c78a38af59b. It is suggested to install a patch to address this issue.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.7
Severity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:N/A:P
cvss3
Base: 3.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in zhuimengshaonian wisdom-education up to 1.0.4. This vulnerability affects the function selectStudentExamInfoList of the file src/main/java/com/education/api/controller/student/ExamInfoController.java. Such manipulation of the argument subjectId leads to improper authorization. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in Campcodes Farm Management System 1.0. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality. The manipulation results in file and directory information exposure. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X