Comparison Overview

Iris Care Group

VS

Pecan Valley Centers for Behavioral and Developmental Healthcare

Iris Care Group

Unit 1, Castleton Court, Cardiff, Cardiff, CF3 0LT, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Iris Care Group is a well established, experienced and innovative organisation that provides specialist care, education and treatment services for individuals with complex and enduring mental health needs and/or personality disorders and other specialist care needs. Our ethos is based on the belief that everyone deserves a life worth living and that through positive care and therapeutic intervention we can help our service users achieve goals that they may never have thought possible before. In our hospitals we provide assessment, treatment and rehabilitation leading to improvement and recovery. Our specialist autism college provides residential and day placement education and care. Our community homes offer continuity of care and very high quality accommodation for more independent living. At Iris Care Group we believe that all individuals can change and it is our role to motivate the people we support to be willing, ready and able to engage in therapeutic opportunities and move towards greater self-responsibility.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 408
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Pecan Valley Centers for Behavioral and Developmental Healthcare

906 Lingleville Hwy, Stephenville, 76401, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Pecan Valley provides a variety of Behavioral Healthcare Services to persons with mental illness, intellectual and developmental disabilities, as well as alcohol and chemical dependency. It is our goal to provide you the quality services you and/or your loved one might need or help you choose a service provider of your choice. Our staff is committed to improving the health and wellness of those in need and protecting your privacy while doing so. Pecan Valley Centers is licensed by the Department of State Health Services (DSHS) and the Department of Aging and Disability Services (DADS). Our staff are credentialed to provide the quality services you are seeking and we serve as both the Mental Health Authority as well as the IDD Authority for the counties we serve. The Pecan Valley Region covers Erath, Hood, Johnson, Palo Pinto, Parker, and Somervell Counties. We are always here to help anyone in need. A good way to access services is through our 24-hour information, intake, and crisis line at 1-800-772-5987.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 213
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ludlow-street-healthcare.jpeg
Iris Care Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pecan-valley-centers-for-behavioral-and-developmental-healthcare.jpeg
Pecan Valley Centers for Behavioral and Developmental Healthcare
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Iris Care Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Pecan Valley Centers for Behavioral and Developmental Healthcare
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Iris Care Group in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pecan Valley Centers for Behavioral and Developmental Healthcare in 2026.

Incident History — Iris Care Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Iris Care Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Pecan Valley Centers for Behavioral and Developmental Healthcare (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pecan Valley Centers for Behavioral and Developmental Healthcare cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ludlow-street-healthcare.jpeg
Iris Care Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pecan-valley-centers-for-behavioral-and-developmental-healthcare.jpeg
Pecan Valley Centers for Behavioral and Developmental Healthcare
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Iris Care Group company and Pecan Valley Centers for Behavioral and Developmental Healthcare company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Pecan Valley Centers for Behavioral and Developmental Healthcare company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Iris Care Group company.

In the current year, Pecan Valley Centers for Behavioral and Developmental Healthcare company and Iris Care Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Pecan Valley Centers for Behavioral and Developmental Healthcare company nor Iris Care Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Pecan Valley Centers for Behavioral and Developmental Healthcare company nor Iris Care Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Pecan Valley Centers for Behavioral and Developmental Healthcare company nor Iris Care Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Iris Care Group company nor Pecan Valley Centers for Behavioral and Developmental Healthcare company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Iris Care Group nor Pecan Valley Centers for Behavioral and Developmental Healthcare holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Iris Care Group company nor Pecan Valley Centers for Behavioral and Developmental Healthcare company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Iris Care Group company employs more people globally than Pecan Valley Centers for Behavioral and Developmental Healthcare company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Iris Care Group nor Pecan Valley Centers for Behavioral and Developmental Healthcare holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Iris Care Group nor Pecan Valley Centers for Behavioral and Developmental Healthcare holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Iris Care Group nor Pecan Valley Centers for Behavioral and Developmental Healthcare holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Iris Care Group nor Pecan Valley Centers for Behavioral and Developmental Healthcare holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Iris Care Group nor Pecan Valley Centers for Behavioral and Developmental Healthcare holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Iris Care Group nor Pecan Valley Centers for Behavioral and Developmental Healthcare holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N