Comparison Overview

Lucidant Polymers

VS

Solvay

Lucidant Polymers

1230 Bordeaux Drive, Sunnyvale, CA, 94089, US
Last Update: 2025-03-04 (UTC)
Between 800 and 900

Strong

Lucidant Polymers provides high performance, custom polymer matrices for biological separations and nanolayer active coatings for molecular surface assays.

NAICS: 325
NAICS Definition: Chemical Manufacturing
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Solvay

Rue de Ransbeek 310, Brussels, undefined, 1120, BE
Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)

Strong

Between 800 and 900

Welcome to Solvay, where science and mastery come together, creating excellence that stands the test of time. With a 160-year legacy, we're not just innovators; we're on a constant journey of progress, mastering the essential elements of our world. We're all about revealing potentials, just like you. Recognizing what's crucial for our world, our solutions aim for a sustainable future, making a positive impact on individuals and communities worldwide. In the market, we're leading the way with best-in-class essential chemicals, making a difference in critical sectors like construction, healthcare, consumer goods, and automotive. Our products, often unseen but always vital, play a crucial role in everyday life. But progress could not been reached without the contribution of the most essential elements, you. Join us in our relentless pursuit of excellence and be part of Solvay's everlasting legacy: where together, we shape a better future for generations to come.

NAICS: 325
NAICS Definition: Chemical Manufacturing
Employees: 17,112
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lucidant-polymers.jpeg
Lucidant Polymers
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/solvay.jpeg
Solvay
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Lucidant Polymers
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Solvay
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Chemical Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lucidant Polymers in 2025.

Incidents vs Chemical Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Solvay in 2025.

Incident History โ€” Lucidant Polymers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lucidant Polymers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Solvay (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Solvay cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lucidant-polymers.jpeg
Lucidant Polymers
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/solvay.jpeg
Solvay
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Lucidant Polymers company and Solvay company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Solvay company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Lucidant Polymers company.

In the current year, Solvay company and Lucidant Polymers company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Solvay company nor Lucidant Polymers company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Solvay company nor Lucidant Polymers company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Solvay company nor Lucidant Polymers company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Lucidant Polymers company nor Solvay company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Solvay company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Lucidant Polymers company.

Solvay company employs more people globally than Lucidant Polymers company, reflecting its scale as a Chemical Manufacturing.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Better Auth is an authentication and authorization library for TypeScript. In versions prior to 1.3.26, unauthenticated attackers can create or modify API keys for any user by passing that user's id in the request body to the `api/auth/api-key/create` route. `session?.user ?? (authRequired ? null : { id: ctx.body.userId })`. When no session exists but `userId` is present in the request body, `authRequired` becomes false and the user object is set to the attacker-controlled ID. Server-only field validation only executes when `authRequired` is true (lines 280-295), allowing attackers to set privileged fields. No additional authentication occurs before the database operation, so the malicious payload is accepted. The same pattern exists in the update endpoint. This is a critical authentication bypass enabling full an unauthenticated attacker can generate an API key for any user and immediately gain complete authenticated access. This allows the attacker to perform any action as the victim user using the api key, potentially compromise the user data and the application depending on the victim's privileges. Version 1.3.26 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Allstar is a GitHub App to set and enforce security policies. In versions prior to 4.5, a vulnerability in Allstarโ€™s Reviewbot component caused inbound webhook requests to be validated against a hard-coded, shared secret. The value used for the secret token was compiled into the Allstar binary and could not be configured at runtime. In practice, this meant that every deployment using Reviewbot would validate requests with the same secret unless the operator modified source code and rebuilt the component - an expectation that is not documented and is easy to miss. All Allstar releases prior to v4.5 that include the Reviewbot code path are affected. Deployments on v4.5 and later are not affected. Those who have not enabled or exposed the Reviewbot endpoint are not exposed to this issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 4.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities with Calendar events in Liferay Portal 7.4.3.35 through 7.4.3.111, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q4.0 through 2023.Q4.5, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.7, 7.4 update 35 through update 92, and 7.3 update 25 through update 36 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a crafted payload injected into a userโ€™s (1) First Name, (2) Middle Name or (3) Last Name text field.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Python Social Auth is a social authentication/registration mechanism. In versions prior to 5.6.0, upon authentication, the user could be associated by e-mail even if the `associate_by_email` pipeline was not included. This could lead to account compromise when a third-party authentication service does not validate provided e-mail addresses or doesn't require unique e-mail addresses. Version 5.6.0 contains a patch. As a workaround, review the authentication service policy on e-mail addresses; many will not allow exploiting this vulnerability.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Confidential Containers's Trustee project contains tools and components for attesting confidential guests and providing secrets to them. In versions prior to 0.15.0, the attestation-policy endpoint didn't check if the kbs-client submitting the request was actually authenticated (had the right key). This allowed any kbs-client to actually change the attestation policy. Version 0.15.0 fixes the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X