Comparison Overview

LSR Sugar company

VS

Kohler Co.

LSR Sugar company

undefined, undefined, undefined, 70052, US
Last Update: 2025-03-08 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000

Excellent

Newly designed sugar refinery in Gramercy, LA

NAICS: 339
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 49
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Kohler Co.

444 Highland Drive, None, Kohler, Wisconsin, US, 53044
Last Update: 2025-07-27 (UTC)

Weโ€™re a community of creators. Status quo busters. Difference makers. For the past 150 years, weโ€™ve built our business on a singular missionโ€”helping people live gracious, healthy, and sustainable lives. Thanks to the passion, craftsmanship, and ingenuity of our associates around the world, our business has expanded across the globe with a diverse portfolio of brands. Today, weโ€™re one of Americaโ€™s oldest and largest privately held companies. We manufacture smart kitchen & bath products and host world-class hospitality experiences. At 30,000 strong, weโ€™re the driving force behind so much meaningful progress as we strive to #BecomeMoreAtKohlerโ€”individually and together. Weโ€™re unafraid of bold action and inspired to design better tomorrows. Hereโ€™s to the next 150 years. Learn more about Kohler's hiring practices to help you avoid recruitment fraud: https://www.kohlercompany.com/careers/how-we-hire/recruitment-fraud/

NAICS: 30
NAICS Definition: Manufacturing
Employees: 14,194
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lsr-sugar-company.jpeg
LSR Sugar company
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kohler.jpeg
Kohler Co.
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
LSR Sugar company
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Kohler Co.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LSR Sugar company in 2025.

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kohler Co. in 2025.

Incident History โ€” LSR Sugar company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LSR Sugar company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Kohler Co. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kohler Co. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lsr-sugar-company.jpeg
LSR Sugar company
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kohler.jpeg
Kohler Co.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

LSR Sugar company company company demonstrates a stronger AI risk posture compared to Kohler Co. company company, reflecting its advanced AI governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Kohler Co. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to LSR Sugar company company.

In the current year, Kohler Co. company and LSR Sugar company company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Kohler Co. company nor LSR Sugar company company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Kohler Co. company nor LSR Sugar company company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Kohler Co. company nor LSR Sugar company company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither LSR Sugar company company nor Kohler Co. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Kohler Co. company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to LSR Sugar company company.

Kohler Co. company employs more people globally than LSR Sugar company company, reflecting its scale as a Manufacturing.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

TS3 Manager is modern web interface for maintaining Teamspeak3 servers. A reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability has been identified in versions 2.2.1 and earlier. The vulnerability exists in the error handling mechanism of the login page, where malicious scripts embedded in server hostnames are executed in the victim's browser context without proper sanitization. This issue is fixed in version 2.2.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

TS3 Manager is modern web interface for maintaining Teamspeak3 servers. A Denial of Dervice vulnerability has been identified in versions 2.2.1 and earlier. The vulnerability permits an unauthenticated actor to crash the application through the submission of specially crafted Unicode input, requiring no prior authentication or privileges. The flaw manifests when Unicode tag characters are submitted to the Server field on the login page. The application fails to properly handle these characters during the ASCII conversion process, resulting in an unhandled exception that terminates the application within four to five seconds of submission. This issue is fixed in version 2.2.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Weblate is a web based localization tool. An open redirect exists in versions 5.13.2 and below via the redir parameter on .within.website when Weblate is configured with Anubis and REDIRECT_DOMAINS is not set. An attacker can craft a URL on the legitimate domain that redirects a victim to an attacker-controlled site. The redirect can also be used to initiate drive-by downloads (redirecting to a URL that serves a malicious file), increasing the risk to end users. This issue is fixed in version 5.13.3.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Termix is a web-based server management platform with SSH terminal, tunneling, and file editing capabilities. The official Docker image for Termix versions 1.5.0 and below, due to being configured with an Nginx reverse proxy, causes the backend to retrieve the proxy's IP instead of the client's IP when using the req.ip method. This results in isLocalhost always returning True. Consequently, the /ssh/db/host/internal endpoint can be accessed directly without login or authentication. This endpoint records the system's stored SSH host information, including addresses, usernames, and passwords, posing an extremely high security risk. Users who use the official Termix docker image, build their own image using the official dockerfile, or utilize reverse proxy functionality will be affected by this vulnerability. This issue is fixed in version 1.6.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OpenPLC_V3 has a vulnerability in the enipThread function that occurs due to the lack of a return value. This leads to a crash when the server loop ends and execution hits an illegal ud2 instruction. This issue can be triggered remotely without authentication by starting the same server multiple times or if the server exits unexpectedly. The vulnerability allows an attacker to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) against the PLC runtime, stopping any PC started remotely without authentication. This results in the PLC process crashing and halting all automation or control logic managed by OpenPLC.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X