Comparison Overview

LSC Communications

VS

SinaLite

LSC Communications

191 North Wacker Drive , Chicago, IL, 60606, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

With a rich history of industry experience, innovative solutions and service reliability, LSC Communications (NYSE: LKSD) is a global leader in print and digital media solutions. Our traditional and digital print-related services and office products serve the needs of publishers, brands, retailers and merchandisers around the world. With advanced technology and a consultative approach, our supply chain solutions meet the needs of each business by getting their content into the right hands as efficiently as possible.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 3,567
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

SinaLite

335 Steelcase Road East, Markham, Ontario, L3R1G3, CA
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

SinaLite is a B2B wholesale print service provider exclusively catering to the needs of trade customers and resellers such as printers, print brokers, signs shops, and more. Our focus is simple; we deliver the highest industry standard print products with dedicated customer service. We empower our customers to: • Maximize their print profits by lowering production costs • Save time with instant quotes and blind shipping • Become a one-stop print shop that offers 1,000+ types of products Maximize your print profits today with SinaLite! ⭐ 2025 Regional Finalist in the Canada's Best Managed Companies Program

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 107
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lsc-communications-us.jpeg
LSC Communications
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sina-printing-inc-.jpeg
SinaLite
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
LSC Communications
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
SinaLite
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LSC Communications in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SinaLite in 2025.

Incident History — LSC Communications (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LSC Communications cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — SinaLite (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SinaLite cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lsc-communications-us.jpeg
LSC Communications
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sina-printing-inc-.jpeg
SinaLite
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

LSC Communications company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to SinaLite company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, SinaLite company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to LSC Communications company.

In the current year, SinaLite company and LSC Communications company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither SinaLite company nor LSC Communications company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither SinaLite company nor LSC Communications company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither SinaLite company nor LSC Communications company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither LSC Communications company nor SinaLite company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither LSC Communications nor SinaLite holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither LSC Communications company nor SinaLite company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

LSC Communications company employs more people globally than SinaLite company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither LSC Communications nor SinaLite holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither LSC Communications nor SinaLite holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither LSC Communications nor SinaLite holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither LSC Communications nor SinaLite holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither LSC Communications nor SinaLite holds HIPAA certification.

Neither LSC Communications nor SinaLite holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N