Comparison Overview

LPS Labels

VS

Redhaus Design

LPS Labels

3937 Westpoint Blvd, Winston-Salem, NC, 27103, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

At LPS Labels in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, we put the benefit of our more than 30 years of labeling products and services into every project. Whether you need a small batch for a special project or ongoing labels for your products, you can count on our dedicate staff to approach your project with passion and professionalism. We understand that your labels are a representation of you and will work diligently to make that image everything you deserve. Our dedication to color management ensures that your colors will be on target and stay true from batch to batch, maintaining the integrity of your brand.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Redhaus Design

None
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799

We give life to ideas. And, like you, we are constantly striving to distinguish ourselves from our competition. Other companies will attempt to woo you with some of their advertising gimmicks or spout a list of their services that range from business cards to billboards, but we will not. Simply put... We offer the resources that you need to set you apart from the rest.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lps-labels.jpeg
LPS Labels
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/redhaus-design.jpeg
Redhaus Design
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
LPS Labels
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Redhaus Design
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LPS Labels in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Redhaus Design in 2025.

Incident History — LPS Labels (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LPS Labels cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Redhaus Design (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Redhaus Design cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lps-labels.jpeg
LPS Labels
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/redhaus-design.jpeg
Redhaus Design
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Redhaus Design company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to LPS Labels company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Redhaus Design company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to LPS Labels company.

In the current year, Redhaus Design company and LPS Labels company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Redhaus Design company nor LPS Labels company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Redhaus Design company nor LPS Labels company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Redhaus Design company nor LPS Labels company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither LPS Labels company nor Redhaus Design company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither LPS Labels nor Redhaus Design holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither LPS Labels company nor Redhaus Design company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

LPS Labels company employs more people globally than Redhaus Design company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither LPS Labels nor Redhaus Design holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither LPS Labels nor Redhaus Design holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither LPS Labels nor Redhaus Design holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither LPS Labels nor Redhaus Design holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither LPS Labels nor Redhaus Design holds HIPAA certification.

Neither LPS Labels nor Redhaus Design holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X