Comparison Overview

LPM

VS

Country Garden Group

LPM

Floor 4, Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park, E203BS, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.l-pm.co.uk

LPM is a residential property management and lettings company. Our company offers a high-quality service from a dedicated team, trained and qualified to Propertymark’s ARLA standards. We make the connection between high quality marketing, to attract high-quality tenants which will lead to maximising your investment. We pride ourselves on delivering a great customer experience unrivalled by our competitors. Use of the latest technology allows landlords and tenants to sign contract renewal or check their latest statement, any time of the day from the comfort of their computer or phone using our Landlord Portal. At the heart of our business is the absolute commitment to remove the stress that comes from managing your property investment.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Country Garden Group

345 Nathan Rd, Yau Tsim Mong, HK
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 750 and 799
http://bgy.com.cn/

Forbes 500 500 Projects Globally Top 10 Real Estate Company in China Over the past 20 years, Country Garden has been a practitioner in China's urbanization, bringing modernization to landscape and improving the quality of people's lives. Besides Mainland China, Country Garden has also been actively expanding overseas markets since 2012, including Malaysia, Australia, Indonesia, India, Thailand, Myanmar, Laos, Russia, Vietnam, Britain, US and other countries. Pairing your unique skills with our global resources and expertise, Country Garden will give you the career you desire. For more information: http://www.bgy.com.cn/china/index.aspx

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 15,680
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lpm-property-management.jpeg
LPM
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/country-garden-holding-co--ltd-.jpeg
Country Garden Group
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
LPM
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Country Garden Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LPM in 2026.

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Country Garden Group in 2026.

Incident History — LPM (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LPM cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Country Garden Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Country Garden Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lpm-property-management.jpeg
LPM
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Misconfigured Cloud Storage
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/country-garden-holding-co--ltd-.jpeg
Country Garden Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Country Garden Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to LPM company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

LPM company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Country Garden Group company has not reported any.

In the current year, Country Garden Group company and LPM company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Country Garden Group company nor LPM company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

LPM company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Country Garden Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Country Garden Group company nor LPM company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither LPM company nor Country Garden Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither LPM nor Country Garden Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Country Garden Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to LPM company.

Country Garden Group company employs more people globally than LPM company, reflecting its scale as a Real Estate.

Neither LPM nor Country Garden Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither LPM nor Country Garden Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither LPM nor Country Garden Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither LPM nor Country Garden Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither LPM nor Country Garden Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither LPM nor Country Garden Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References