Comparison Overview

lowercase productions

VS

Lúgh Studio, Inc.

lowercase productions

None
Last Update: 2025-12-03

Just like the Lorax who spoke for the trees, we speak for the buildings and the streets if you please... Established in 2005, lcp is not your typical marketing or design firm. We are a collective of individual graphic designers, information designers, architects, interior designers, city planners, website programmers, signage experts, you name it, all focused on improving the way we communicate in the architecture and engineering world.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Lúgh Studio, Inc.

219 36th St, Brooklyn, New York, 11232, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 700 and 749

VISUAL STORYTELLERS, MARKETERS AND TECHNOLOGY EXPERTS We’re a team of designers, programmers, and marketers dedicated to helping nonprofits and businesses increase revenue through tailor-made websites, social media, email, content, and marketing strategies crafted to captivate and engage their specific audiences. For over 25 years, we’ve delivered fresh and innovative design, marketing and technology solutions to Nonprofits, Real Estate, Publishing, STEM, Financial Services, eCommerce and Professional Services clients. Our focus is on bring your vision to life! We take your unique story and expertly adapt it across print, in-person and digital platforms. Lúgh Studio — Your creative design and technology partner.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lowercase-productions.jpeg
lowercase productions
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/l-gh-studio-inc-.jpeg
Lúgh Studio, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
lowercase productions
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Lúgh Studio, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for lowercase productions in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lúgh Studio, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — lowercase productions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

lowercase productions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Lúgh Studio, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lúgh Studio, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lowercase-productions.jpeg
lowercase productions
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/l-gh-studio-inc-.jpeg
Lúgh Studio, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

lowercase productions company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Lúgh Studio, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Lúgh Studio, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to lowercase productions company.

In the current year, Lúgh Studio, Inc. company and lowercase productions company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Lúgh Studio, Inc. company nor lowercase productions company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Lúgh Studio, Inc. company nor lowercase productions company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Lúgh Studio, Inc. company nor lowercase productions company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither lowercase productions company nor Lúgh Studio, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither lowercase productions nor Lúgh Studio, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither lowercase productions company nor Lúgh Studio, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Lúgh Studio, Inc. company employs more people globally than lowercase productions company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither lowercase productions nor Lúgh Studio, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither lowercase productions nor Lúgh Studio, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither lowercase productions nor Lúgh Studio, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither lowercase productions nor Lúgh Studio, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither lowercase productions nor Lúgh Studio, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither lowercase productions nor Lúgh Studio, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X