Comparison Overview

Lovell Johns

VS

New Holland Publishers Australia

Lovell Johns

GB
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

Lovell Johns delivers high quality map making and geographic solutions to the public sector, publishers and all sizes of business. Many of our solutions are bespoke and fit a specific requirement, being a truly independent map company enables us to deliver the most suitable and cost effective solutions for our clients. Where possible we use open source mapping and software which complements our expert knowledge and access to key software and data providers such as Ordnance Survey and Esri.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

New Holland Publishers Australia

1/66 Lower Gibbes St,, Sydney, undefined, 2067, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

New Holland Publishers produces quality non-fiction. We concentrate on innovative design and thinking outside the box to find new ways of publishing to a wider readership. Our focus is on lifestyle, cooking, gardening, natural history, human interest, crime, reference, biographies, business and a small range of fiction titles under our gibbes street imprint. Gifts and stationery is expanding under our new imprints Spank, Spade and Spangles.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lovell-johns.jpeg
Lovell Johns
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/new-holland-publishers-australia.jpeg
New Holland Publishers Australia
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Lovell Johns
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
New Holland Publishers Australia
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lovell Johns in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for New Holland Publishers Australia in 2025.

Incident History — Lovell Johns (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lovell Johns cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — New Holland Publishers Australia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

New Holland Publishers Australia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lovell-johns.jpeg
Lovell Johns
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/new-holland-publishers-australia.jpeg
New Holland Publishers Australia
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Lovell Johns company and New Holland Publishers Australia company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, New Holland Publishers Australia company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Lovell Johns company.

In the current year, New Holland Publishers Australia company and Lovell Johns company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither New Holland Publishers Australia company nor Lovell Johns company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither New Holland Publishers Australia company nor Lovell Johns company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither New Holland Publishers Australia company nor Lovell Johns company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Lovell Johns company nor New Holland Publishers Australia company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Lovell Johns nor New Holland Publishers Australia holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Lovell Johns company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to New Holland Publishers Australia company.

New Holland Publishers Australia company employs more people globally than Lovell Johns company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Lovell Johns nor New Holland Publishers Australia holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Lovell Johns nor New Holland Publishers Australia holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Lovell Johns nor New Holland Publishers Australia holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Lovell Johns nor New Holland Publishers Australia holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Lovell Johns nor New Holland Publishers Australia holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Lovell Johns nor New Holland Publishers Australia holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.