Comparison Overview

Lovelace Law, PC

VS

Kelly Hart & Hallman LLP

Lovelace Law, PC

283 Market St, Burleson, Texas, US, 76028
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Mission Lovelace Law, PC, is a full service law firm committed to the Johnson and Tarrant County communities. This commitment allows us to better represent and understand the desires of our clients. All of our attorneys have been recognized as "Top Attorneys"​ in their respective fields. Our litigation attorneys worked for large firms throughout Texas and now use the knowledge acquired with those firms to benefit our clients. Our family law attorneys have represented hundreds of clients successfully throughout North Texas. While these matters are diverse, our background makes it uniquely suited to provide exemplary representation to our clients. About Us Our goal is to provide our clients with superior legal representation in the most cost effective manner. Our attorneys have significant experience in family law matters, estate planning and probate matters, complex litigation issues, personal injury disputes and advising oil and gas companies. These experiences allow our attorneys to provide knowledgeable, aggressive representation in the conference room, at the negotiation table, and in the courtroom.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Kelly Hart & Hallman LLP

Wells Fargo Tower, 201 Main Street, Suite 2500, Fort Worth, Texas, US, 76102
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

For over 40 years, Kelly Hart & Hallman has provided some of the country's most innovative and successful businesses, individuals and governmental entities with a full array of legal services. In those same 40 years, Kelly Hart has grown from five attorneys to over 150 practicing in more than twenty substantive areas of the law. We owe this success to our outstanding lawyers and unparalleled clients. We look forward to the future and building on our legacy of success.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 279
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lovelace-law-pllc.jpeg
Lovelace Law, PC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kelly-hart-&-hallman-llp.jpeg
Kelly Hart & Hallman LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Lovelace Law, PC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Kelly Hart & Hallman LLP
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lovelace Law, PC in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kelly Hart & Hallman LLP in 2025.

Incident History — Lovelace Law, PC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lovelace Law, PC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Kelly Hart & Hallman LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kelly Hart & Hallman LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lovelace-law-pllc.jpeg
Lovelace Law, PC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kelly-hart-&-hallman-llp.jpeg
Kelly Hart & Hallman LLP
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Kelly Hart & Hallman LLP company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Lovelace Law, PC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Kelly Hart & Hallman LLP company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Lovelace Law, PC company.

In the current year, Kelly Hart & Hallman LLP company and Lovelace Law, PC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Kelly Hart & Hallman LLP company nor Lovelace Law, PC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Kelly Hart & Hallman LLP company nor Lovelace Law, PC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Kelly Hart & Hallman LLP company nor Lovelace Law, PC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Lovelace Law, PC company nor Kelly Hart & Hallman LLP company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Lovelace Law, PC nor Kelly Hart & Hallman LLP holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Lovelace Law, PC company nor Kelly Hart & Hallman LLP company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Kelly Hart & Hallman LLP company employs more people globally than Lovelace Law, PC company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Lovelace Law, PC nor Kelly Hart & Hallman LLP holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Lovelace Law, PC nor Kelly Hart & Hallman LLP holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Lovelace Law, PC nor Kelly Hart & Hallman LLP holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Lovelace Law, PC nor Kelly Hart & Hallman LLP holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Lovelace Law, PC nor Kelly Hart & Hallman LLP holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Lovelace Law, PC nor Kelly Hart & Hallman LLP holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X