Comparison Overview

Loupe Digital

VS

Advocate Printing & Publishing

Loupe Digital

New York, US
Last Update: 2025-12-18
Between 750 and 799

Established in 2009, Loupe Digital has been providing quality photographic lab and digitization services to discerning clientele in multiple industries. Our portfolio of services encompasses all aspects of production allowing us to see projects through from inception to final installation. We offer digitization, printing, mounting and framing all under one roof. We have had the good fortune to work with numerous Gallery and Museum clients as well as a plethora of individual artists and archives to best present their work. Our staff of trained professionals all have a minimum of ten years working experience in the industry and regularly conduct research to constantly improve our process and techniques. Utilizing the latest technology and materials with an educated approach, we are here to facilitate all requirements for fine quality visual demands.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Advocate Printing & Publishing

181 Browns Point Rd, Pictou, B0K, CA
Last Update: 2025-12-18
Between 750 and 799

Advocate Printing & Publishing, the largest independent printer in Atlantic Canada, was founded in 1891. Headquartered in Pictou, Nova Scotia, with locations in Nova Scotia and New Brunswick, the company services the Atlantic Provinces, the eastern seaboard and across Canada. The company’s clients include a diverse range of businesses spanning from boutique operations and budding entrepreneurs to vast global leaders. In addition to the Pictou location, Advocate Printing & Publishing operates print plants in Dieppe, New Brunswick and St. Croix Printing and Publishing in St. Stephen, New Brunswick, and Metro Guide Publishing in Halifax Nova Scotia. As well, the company includes 7 newspapers, 20 trade and regional magazines catering to diverse market sectors, a flyer distribution company, a commercial photography studio, a videography studio and a creative design studio. The printing business includes production of everything from national flyers, magazines, direct mail to brochures, business cards, and promotional materials such as in ice signage and banners.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 122
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/loupe-digital.jpeg
Loupe Digital
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/advocate-printing-&-publishing.jpeg
Advocate Printing & Publishing
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Loupe Digital
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Advocate Printing & Publishing
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Loupe Digital in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Advocate Printing & Publishing in 2025.

Incident History — Loupe Digital (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Loupe Digital cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Advocate Printing & Publishing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Advocate Printing & Publishing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/loupe-digital.jpeg
Loupe Digital
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/advocate-printing-&-publishing.jpeg
Advocate Printing & Publishing
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Loupe Digital company and Advocate Printing & Publishing company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Advocate Printing & Publishing company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Loupe Digital company.

In the current year, Advocate Printing & Publishing company and Loupe Digital company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Advocate Printing & Publishing company nor Loupe Digital company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Advocate Printing & Publishing company nor Loupe Digital company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Advocate Printing & Publishing company nor Loupe Digital company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Loupe Digital company nor Advocate Printing & Publishing company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Loupe Digital nor Advocate Printing & Publishing holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Loupe Digital company nor Advocate Printing & Publishing company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Advocate Printing & Publishing company employs more people globally than Loupe Digital company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Loupe Digital nor Advocate Printing & Publishing holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Loupe Digital nor Advocate Printing & Publishing holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Loupe Digital nor Advocate Printing & Publishing holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Loupe Digital nor Advocate Printing & Publishing holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Loupe Digital nor Advocate Printing & Publishing holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Loupe Digital nor Advocate Printing & Publishing holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L