Comparison Overview

Louisville Addiction Center

VS

Gateway Recovery Center

Louisville Addiction Center

827 E Market St, Louisville, 40206, US
Last Update: 2026-01-19
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
www.louisvilleaddictioncenter.com

Louisville Addiction Center is the leader in long-term treatment located in Kentucky. We provide Partial Hospitalization Program, Intensive Outpatient Program as well as Outpatient. Our primary focus is the substance use disorder but we also treat the mental health aspect. Our goal as a treatment provider is to equip our clients with the tools and coping skills they need to live a life of sustained sobriety.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Gateway Recovery Center

1303 N State Road 7, Ste B1, Margate, FL, US, 33063
Last Update: 2026-01-21
Between 750 and 799
https://www.gatewayrecoveryflorida.com/

Gateway Recovery Center is a dual-diagnosis, DCF & JCAHO Accredited facility that provides an Intensive Outpatient Treatment Program, which is the most flexible option in the recovery industry for the treatment & rehabilitation of those that struggle with mental health or substance abuse. Our program gives you access to a structured environment with treatment from leading industry professionals, all while offering our clients the flexibility to continue going about their everyday lives while getting the help they need to achieve purposeful, long-term sobriety.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/louisville-addiction-center.jpeg
Louisville Addiction Center
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gateway-recovery-center-florida.jpeg
Gateway Recovery Center
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Louisville Addiction Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Gateway Recovery Center
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Louisville Addiction Center in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gateway Recovery Center in 2026.

Incident History — Louisville Addiction Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Louisville Addiction Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Gateway Recovery Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gateway Recovery Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/louisville-addiction-center.jpeg
Louisville Addiction Center
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gateway-recovery-center-florida.jpeg
Gateway Recovery Center
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Gateway Recovery Center company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Louisville Addiction Center company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Gateway Recovery Center company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Louisville Addiction Center company.

In the current year, Gateway Recovery Center company and Louisville Addiction Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Gateway Recovery Center company nor Louisville Addiction Center company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Gateway Recovery Center company nor Louisville Addiction Center company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Gateway Recovery Center company nor Louisville Addiction Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Louisville Addiction Center company nor Gateway Recovery Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Louisville Addiction Center nor Gateway Recovery Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Louisville Addiction Center company nor Gateway Recovery Center company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Louisville Addiction Center company employs more people globally than Gateway Recovery Center company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Louisville Addiction Center nor Gateway Recovery Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Louisville Addiction Center nor Gateway Recovery Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Louisville Addiction Center nor Gateway Recovery Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Louisville Addiction Center nor Gateway Recovery Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Louisville Addiction Center nor Gateway Recovery Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Louisville Addiction Center nor Gateway Recovery Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References