Comparison Overview

Louisiana State University

VS

Université de Montréal

Louisiana State University

Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, la, 70803, US
Last Update: 2026-01-18
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.lsu.edu

LSU is the flagship institution of Louisiana and is one of only 30 universities nationwide holding land-grant, sea-grant and space-grant status. Since 1860, LSU has served its region, the nation, and the world through extensive, multipurpose programs encompassing instruction, research, and public service. The university brings in more than $150 million annually in outside research grants and contracts, a significant factor for the Louisiana economy.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 11,244
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Université de Montréal

Station Centre-ville, H3C 3J7, Montreal, Montréal, QC, CA
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799
http://www.umontreal.ca

Université de Montréal and its two affiliated schools, Polytechnique Montréal and HEC Montréal, is Quebec's biggest university complex and one of the largest in North America. Its 450,000 graduates make their presence felt around the globe and in every sphere of activity. Since 2018, UdeM has consistently ranked as one of Canada's top 100 employers.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 12,048
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/louisiana-state-university.jpeg
Louisiana State University
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/universite-de-montreal.jpeg
Université de Montréal
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Louisiana State University
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Université de Montréal
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Louisiana State University in 2026.

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Université de Montréal in 2026.

Incident History — Louisiana State University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Louisiana State University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Université de Montréal (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Université de Montréal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/louisiana-state-university.jpeg
Louisiana State University
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/universite-de-montreal.jpeg
Université de Montréal
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Université de Montréal company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Louisiana State University company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Université de Montréal company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Louisiana State University company.

In the current year, Université de Montréal company and Louisiana State University company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Université de Montréal company nor Louisiana State University company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Université de Montréal company nor Louisiana State University company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Université de Montréal company nor Louisiana State University company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Louisiana State University company nor Université de Montréal company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Louisiana State University nor Université de Montréal holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Louisiana State University company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Université de Montréal company.

Université de Montréal company employs more people globally than Louisiana State University company, reflecting its scale as a Higher Education.

Neither Louisiana State University nor Université de Montréal holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Louisiana State University nor Université de Montréal holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Louisiana State University nor Université de Montréal holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Louisiana State University nor Université de Montréal holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Louisiana State University nor Université de Montréal holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Louisiana State University nor Université de Montréal holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References