Comparison Overview

Louisiana State University

VS

University of California, San Francisco

Louisiana State University

Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, la, 70803, US
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799

LSU is the flagship institution of Louisiana and is one of only 30 universities nationwide holding land-grant, sea-grant and space-grant status. Since 1860, LSU has served its region, the nation, and the world through extensive, multipurpose programs encompassing instruction, research, and public service. The university brings in more than $150 million annually in outside research grants and contracts, a significant factor for the Louisiana economy.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 11,244
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

University of California, San Francisco

530 Parnassus Ave, San Francisco, California, US, 94122
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 650 and 699

UC San Francisco is driven by the idea that when the best research, the best education and the best patient care converge, great breakthroughs are achieved. We pursue this integrated excellence with singular focus, fueled by collaboration among our top-ranked professional and graduate schools, medical center, research programs and support teams.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 21,340
Subsidiaries: 57
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
13
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/louisiana-state-university.jpeg
Louisiana State University
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ucsf.jpeg
University of California, San Francisco
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Louisiana State University
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
University of California, San Francisco
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Louisiana State University in 2026.

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of California, San Francisco in 2026.

Incident History — Louisiana State University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Louisiana State University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — University of California, San Francisco (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of California, San Francisco cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/louisiana-state-university.jpeg
Louisiana State University
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ucsf.jpeg
University of California, San Francisco
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2024
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 1/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Phishing
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2023
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Louisiana State University company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to University of California, San Francisco company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

University of California, San Francisco company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Louisiana State University company has not reported any.

In the current year, University of California, San Francisco company and Louisiana State University company have not reported any cyber incidents.

University of California, San Francisco company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Louisiana State University company has not reported such incidents publicly.

University of California, San Francisco company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Louisiana State University company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither University of California, San Francisco company nor Louisiana State University company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Louisiana State University company nor University of California, San Francisco company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Louisiana State University nor University of California, San Francisco holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

University of California, San Francisco company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Louisiana State University company.

University of California, San Francisco company employs more people globally than Louisiana State University company, reflecting its scale as a Higher Education.

Neither Louisiana State University nor University of California, San Francisco holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Louisiana State University nor University of California, San Francisco holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Louisiana State University nor University of California, San Francisco holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Louisiana State University nor University of California, San Francisco holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Louisiana State University nor University of California, San Francisco holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Louisiana State University nor University of California, San Francisco holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.