Comparison Overview

Louis Quail

VS

Fleming Photography Studio™

Louis Quail

hp42lf, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Louis is an experienced photographer specialising in editorial. He has worked extensively for some of the worlds top magazines in he last six months alone ( time of writing 10/2009) he has had feature spreads in the Saturday Times, Guardian Weekend, Saturday Telegraph, German Geo, Politiken, and US Marie Claire; he has twice been a finalist at the National Portrait gallery annual exhibition, and is held in their permanent collection.

NAICS: 54192
NAICS Definition: Photographic Services
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Fleming Photography Studio™

109 Third Street, Lynden, WA, 98264, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17

If you are looking for FUN PHOTOGRAPHERS who will capture images that will make you smile, and sometimes cry...then you are at the right place. We are Randy and Cathy Fleming, owners and photographers of an UPSCALE, FULL SERVICE wedding and portrait studio, bringing CLASSICALLY FUNKY MODERN PORTRAITURE to the Whatcom County neighborhood. We specialize in capturing expecting parents, adorable newborns, fun-loving children and families, extraordinary high school seniors, and so-in-love couples! Check out our fresh & unique style. We personally custom edit each individual portrait, and are proud to offer our services at our PROFESSIONAL STUDIO, along with outdoor locations as well! What better way to celebrate life then to capture who you are at this moment with a CUSTOM SESSION with Fleming Photography Studio. Stop by and say hi, we'd LOVE to meet ya!

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Louis Quail
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fleming-photography-studio-.jpeg
Fleming Photography Studio™
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Louis Quail
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Fleming Photography Studio™
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Louis Quail in 2025.

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fleming Photography Studio™ in 2025.

Incident History — Louis Quail (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Louis Quail cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Fleming Photography Studio™ (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fleming Photography Studio™ cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Louis Quail
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fleming-photography-studio-.jpeg
Fleming Photography Studio™
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Louis Quail company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Fleming Photography Studio™ company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Fleming Photography Studio™ company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Louis Quail company.

In the current year, Fleming Photography Studio™ company and Louis Quail company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Fleming Photography Studio™ company nor Louis Quail company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Fleming Photography Studio™ company nor Louis Quail company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Fleming Photography Studio™ company nor Louis Quail company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Louis Quail company nor Fleming Photography Studio™ company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Louis Quail nor Fleming Photography Studio™ holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Louis Quail company nor Fleming Photography Studio™ company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Fleming Photography Studio™ company employs more people globally than Louis Quail company, reflecting its scale as a Photography.

Neither Louis Quail nor Fleming Photography Studio™ holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Louis Quail nor Fleming Photography Studio™ holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Louis Quail nor Fleming Photography Studio™ holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Louis Quail nor Fleming Photography Studio™ holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Louis Quail nor Fleming Photography Studio™ holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Louis Quail nor Fleming Photography Studio™ holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N