Comparison Overview

Lotus Counseling Group

VS

Copernican Clinical Services, Inc

Lotus Counseling Group

4914 Monroe Rd, Charlotte, 28205, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://http://www.lotuscounselinggroup.com

Lotus Counseling Group is a trusted brand for mental health services, consultation, and training. We specialize in relationship therapy with a focus on couples, individuals, and families. We are also trauma-inform clinicians who work to empower, search for strengths, and forge connections in your relationships. We serve issues related but not limited to infidelity, addiction, sexual abuse, parenting, blended families, anxiety, depression, life transitions, and conflict couples. Proudly serving our community and building a safe and confidential place for healing. We are an affirming LGBTQIA+ service provider.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Copernican Clinical Services, Inc

44 Thornton Street, Newton, MA, 02458, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
http://www.copernican.solutions

At Copernican Clinical Services (CCS) we utilize a combination of traditional therapy techniques and cutting-edge clinical interventions to help support our patients'​ treatment experiences. Our staff functions as an integrated, CLINICAL TEAM as we coordinate with other professionals in a seamless manner. Our approach to continuity of care is packed with relevant clinical information. We believe that KNOWLEDGE IS POWER. We move our knowledge of treatment to every member of a patient's clinical team.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lotuscounselinggroup.jpeg
Lotus Counseling Group
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/copernicanclinicalservices.jpeg
Copernican Clinical Services, Inc
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Lotus Counseling Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Copernican Clinical Services, Inc
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lotus Counseling Group in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Copernican Clinical Services, Inc in 2026.

Incident History — Lotus Counseling Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lotus Counseling Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Copernican Clinical Services, Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Copernican Clinical Services, Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lotuscounselinggroup.jpeg
Lotus Counseling Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/copernicanclinicalservices.jpeg
Copernican Clinical Services, Inc
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Lotus Counseling Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Copernican Clinical Services, Inc company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Copernican Clinical Services, Inc company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Lotus Counseling Group company.

In the current year, Copernican Clinical Services, Inc company and Lotus Counseling Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Copernican Clinical Services, Inc company nor Lotus Counseling Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Copernican Clinical Services, Inc company nor Lotus Counseling Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Copernican Clinical Services, Inc company nor Lotus Counseling Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Lotus Counseling Group company nor Copernican Clinical Services, Inc company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Lotus Counseling Group nor Copernican Clinical Services, Inc holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Lotus Counseling Group company nor Copernican Clinical Services, Inc company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Copernican Clinical Services, Inc company employs more people globally than Lotus Counseling Group company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Lotus Counseling Group nor Copernican Clinical Services, Inc holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Lotus Counseling Group nor Copernican Clinical Services, Inc holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Lotus Counseling Group nor Copernican Clinical Services, Inc holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Lotus Counseling Group nor Copernican Clinical Services, Inc holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Lotus Counseling Group nor Copernican Clinical Services, Inc holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Lotus Counseling Group nor Copernican Clinical Services, Inc holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References