Comparison Overview

L'Oréal

VS

The Estée Lauder Companies Inc.

L'Oréal

41, Rue Martre, None, Paris, None, FR, 92110
Last Update: 2025-11-20
Between 800 and 849

No.1 Beauty Group Worldwide. No.1 most innovative company in Europe (Fortune's ranking). We are 90K employees across 150 countries on five continents, united by our shared purpose: creating the beauty that moves the world. Our 37 international brands are divided into four unique Divisions: Luxe, Consumer Products, Dermatological Beauty, and Professional Products. This diverse portfolio includes brands like Kiehl’s, Lancôme, Giorgio Armani Beauty, Yves Saint Laurent Beauté, Ralph Lauren, Aesop, Maybelline New York, Essie, Kérastase, IT Cosmetics, Prada Beauty, Biotherm, Shu Uemura, Viktor&Rolf, Maison Margiela, Urban Decay, Redken, Vichy, La Roche-Posay, Diesel, Garnier, L’Oréal Paris, and more. For more than a century, L’Oréal has devoted itself solely to one business: beauty. We want to bring beauty to all people. Our goal is to win over another one billion consumers around the world by innovating and creating cosmetic and skincare products that meet the infinite diversity of their beauty needs and desires. That’s about us… now what about you? You are driven and up for a challenge! You’re passionate about putting your best foot forward, but you’re not afraid to fail either. You love to learn, grow and make an impact on the world. You can be an intern, or at a senior level position, we’re always looking for new people to join our teams. If you are ready to take charge of your career and join us, you’re one click away: https://careers.loreal.com/en_US/content Interested about our quest to the next billion consumers, follow us here to get the insider scoop on our business, culture, and tips on how to join us to shape the future of beauty. Freedom to go beyond, that’s the beauty of L’Oréal.

NAICS: 32562
NAICS Definition: Toilet Preparation Manufacturing
Employees: 88,983
Subsidiaries: 15
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Estée Lauder Companies Inc.

767 5th Ave, New York, NY, US, 10153
Last Update: 2025-11-24
Between 700 and 749

The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. is one of the world’s leading manufacturers, marketers, and sellers of quality skin care, makeup, fragrance, and hair care products, and is a steward of outstanding luxury and prestige brands globally. The company’s products are sold in approximately 150 countries and territories under brand names including: Estée Lauder, Aramis, Clinique, Lab Series, Origins, M·A·C, La Mer, Bobbi Brown Cosmetics, Aveda, Jo Malone London, Bumble and bumble, Darphin Paris, TOM FORD, Smashbox, AERIN Beauty, Le Labo, Editions de Parfums Frédéric Malle, GLAMGLOW, KILIAN PARIS, Too Faced, Dr.Jart+, the DECIEM family of brands, including The Ordinary and NIOD, and BALMAIN Beauty. To explore our current job openings, go to www.elcompanies.com

NAICS: 32562
NAICS Definition: Toilet Preparation Manufacturing
Employees: 50,183
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/loréal.jpeg
L'Oréal
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-estee-lauder-companies-inc.jpeg
The Estée Lauder Companies Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
L'Oréal
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Estée Lauder Companies Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Personal Care Product Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for L'Oréal in 2025.

Incidents vs Personal Care Product Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — L'Oréal (X = Date, Y = Severity)

L'Oréal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/loréal.jpeg
L'Oréal
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-estee-lauder-companies-inc.jpeg
The Estée Lauder Companies Inc.
Incidents

Date Detected: 7/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: External System Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

L'Oréal company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas L'Oréal company has not reported any.

In the current year, The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. company and L'Oréal company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. company nor L'Oréal company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. company has disclosed at least one data breach, while L'Oréal company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. company nor L'Oréal company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither L'Oréal company nor The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither L'Oréal nor The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

L'Oréal company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. company.

L'Oréal company employs more people globally than The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Personal Care Product Manufacturing.

Neither L'Oréal nor The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither L'Oréal nor The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither L'Oréal nor The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither L'Oréal nor The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither L'Oréal nor The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither L'Oréal nor The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H