Comparison Overview

lori+lulu

VS

Raia

lori+lulu

213 Centre Street, Amelia Island, Florida 32034, US
Last Update: 2025-03-13 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000

Excellent

lori+lulu is a luxury multi-brand luxury women's clothing chain with locations in Florida, North & South Carolina. lori+lulu features laid-back luxury lifestyle brands with a bohemian chic feel. Our brands including Johnny Was, Hale Bob, DL1961 are mostly made in the USA. The concept was spawned by John & Lori Lecker who had owned United Colors of Benetton stores in the southeast for over 30 years & realized there was a giant niche in the market for contemporary comfortable looks with a great fit for the middle age + women.

NAICS: 452
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Raia

None, None, None, None, BR, None
Last Update: 2025-06-22 (UTC)

Strong

Between 800 and 900

Nossa página oficial no LinkedIn é https://bit.ly/2XT3eZl Fundada em 1905 na cidade de Araraquara, a Raia é uma das bandeiras da RD Saúde (Raia Drogasil S.A.) e possui mais de 1000 farmácias em todo o Brasil. A RD Saúde é um ecossistema de saúde integral, com 3 mil farmácias em todo o Brasil e negócios em saúde que dividem o mesmo propósito: contribuir para uma sociedade mais saudável. Sua jornada começou em novembro de 2011, fruto da união entre Raia e Drogasil, crescendo até se tornar a maior rede de farmácias do Brasil e expandindo para além do varejo farmacêutico, integrando soluções B2B e plataformas digitais.

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 10,465
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lori-lulu.jpeg
lori+lulu
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC 2
Not verified
GDPR
No public badge
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/raiaoficial.jpeg
Raia
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC 2
Not verified
GDPR
No public badge
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
lori+lulu
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Raia
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for lori+lulu in 2025.

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Raia in 2025.

Incident History — lori+lulu (X = Date, Y = Severity)

lori+lulu cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Raia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Raia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lori-lulu.jpeg
lori+lulu
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/raiaoficial.jpeg
Raia
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

lori+lulu company company demonstrates a stronger AI risk posture compared to Raia company company, reflecting its advanced AI governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Raia company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to lori+lulu company.

In the current year, Raia company and lori+lulu company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Raia company nor lori+lulu company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Raia company nor lori+lulu company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Raia company nor lori+lulu company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither lori+lulu company nor Raia company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither lori+lulu company nor Raia company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Raia company employs more people globally than lori+lulu company, reflecting its scale as a Retail.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Formbricks is an open source qualtrics alternative. Prior to version 4.0.1, Formbricks is missing JWT signature verification. This vulnerability stems from a token validation routine that only decodes JWTs (jwt.decode) without verifying their signatures. Both the email verification token login path and the password reset server action use the same validator, which does not check the token’s signature, expiration, issuer, or audience. If an attacker learns the victim’s actual user.id, they can craft an arbitrary JWT with an alg: "none" header and use it to authenticate and reset the victim’s password. This issue has been patched in version 4.0.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

Apollo Studio Embeddable Explorer & Embeddable Sandbox are website embeddable software solutions from Apollo GraphQL. Prior to Apollo Sandbox version 2.7.2 and Apollo Explorer version 3.7.3, a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability was identified. The vulnerability arises from missing origin validation in the client-side code that handles window.postMessage events. A malicious website can send forged messages to the embedding page, causing the victim’s browser to execute arbitrary GraphQL queries or mutations against their GraphQL server while authenticated with the victim’s cookies. This issue has been patched in Apollo Sandbox version 2.7.2 and Apollo Explorer version 3.7.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in Portabilis i-Educar up to 2.10. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /consulta-dispensas. Such manipulation leads to improper authorization. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A weakness has been identified in Portabilis i-Educar up to 2.10. Affected is an unknown function of the file /module/Api/aluno. This manipulation of the argument aluno_id causes improper authorization. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in Tencent WeKnora 0.1.0. This impacts the function testEmbeddingModel of the file /api/v1/initialization/embedding/test. The manipulation of the argument baseUrl results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. It is advisable to upgrade the affected component. The vendor responds: "We have confirmed that the issue mentioned in the report does not exist in the latest releases".

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X