Comparison Overview

Lord Howe Island Museum

VS

Natural History Museum collections, science and digitisation centre

Lord Howe Island Museum

Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

The mission of the Lord Howe Island Museum is to present the natural and cultural history of our World Heritage Island. Completed in 2000, the new Lord Howe Island Museum contains two display galleries - Environmental and Historical. The museum also houses a cafe, shop, Visitor Information desk, library and audiovisual room with regular screenings on Lord Howe Island and special guest lecturers. The museum is run by a volunteer committee of six; with extra volunteers staffing a reception desk, and designing temporary displays, cataloging etc.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Natural History Museum collections, science and digitisation centre

Thames Valley Science Park, Berkshire, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-01

A planetary emergency demands an unprecedented response. Our new collections, science and digitisation centre at Thames Valley Science Park, Reading will be a gateway to the natural world, widening access to vital information to deliver innovative solutions to global challenges. With over 80 million objects spanning planetary to microscopic scales, billions of years to fractions of a second, genes to ecosystems and microminerals to mountain ranges, the Museum's collection is a powerful scientific tool. It drives our understanding of the planet, how it looked in the past and how it is changing, and provides a window into evidence-based solutions for our future. We want to protect and continue to expand and improve access to this vast data resource for scientists and researchers all over the world. We will move 28 million specimens and over 600m3 of accompanying Library material to a groundbreaking new centre for the study of natural history at Reading. We will work with partners to harness novel technologies and analysis techniques to gain new insights into the natural world and supercharge digitisation of the collections.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lord-howe-island-museum.jpeg
Lord Howe Island Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nhm-unlocked.jpeg
Natural History Museum collections, science and digitisation centre
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Lord Howe Island Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Natural History Museum collections, science and digitisation centre
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lord Howe Island Museum in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Natural History Museum collections, science and digitisation centre in 2025.

Incident History — Lord Howe Island Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lord Howe Island Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Natural History Museum collections, science and digitisation centre (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Natural History Museum collections, science and digitisation centre cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lord-howe-island-museum.jpeg
Lord Howe Island Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nhm-unlocked.jpeg
Natural History Museum collections, science and digitisation centre
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Lord Howe Island Museum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Natural History Museum collections, science and digitisation centre company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Natural History Museum collections, science and digitisation centre company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Lord Howe Island Museum company.

In the current year, Natural History Museum collections, science and digitisation centre company and Lord Howe Island Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Natural History Museum collections, science and digitisation centre company nor Lord Howe Island Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Natural History Museum collections, science and digitisation centre company nor Lord Howe Island Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Natural History Museum collections, science and digitisation centre company nor Lord Howe Island Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Lord Howe Island Museum company nor Natural History Museum collections, science and digitisation centre company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Lord Howe Island Museum nor Natural History Museum collections, science and digitisation centre holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Natural History Museum collections, science and digitisation centre company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Lord Howe Island Museum company.

Neither Lord Howe Island Museum nor Natural History Museum collections, science and digitisation centre holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Lord Howe Island Museum nor Natural History Museum collections, science and digitisation centre holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Lord Howe Island Museum nor Natural History Museum collections, science and digitisation centre holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Lord Howe Island Museum nor Natural History Museum collections, science and digitisation centre holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Lord Howe Island Museum nor Natural History Museum collections, science and digitisation centre holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Lord Howe Island Museum nor Natural History Museum collections, science and digitisation centre holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X