Comparison Overview

Newbomb Design

VS

Tom Dolle Design

Newbomb Design

3635 Perkins Ave, Cleveland, Ohio, 44114, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.newbomb.com

ENEMIES OF AVERAGE Newbomb Design (formerly Lookout Brand Co.). is a creative design firm based in Cleveland with more than 25 years of experience creating award-winning design. We specialize in graphic design, branding and visual communication. Our work marries bold visuals with engaging messages and effective communication strategies to elevate brands for companies and organizations. Our work in digital and traditional mediums aims for contemporary, confident and creative solutions that drive brand stories with substance and style that will cut to the essence of your brand’s big idea.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Tom Dolle Design

1243 N Gene Autry Trail 123 Palm Springs, California 92262, US
Last Update: 2025-11-29
Between 750 and 799
http://www.dolledesign.com

We have the insight, experience and creative skill that makes our design solutions stand out from the pack. Our ability to move nimbly from packaging to branding, from retail marketing to digital promotions, from art direction to large-scale production is key to our pattern of long-term relationships with a diverse group of clients. Your visual communications need to work harder, look better and think smarter than ever before. Whether you need an individual project, a comprehensive program, or creative direction for your design team, Tom Dolle Design accepts the challenge.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lookout-brand-co..jpeg
Newbomb Design
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tom-dolle-design.jpeg
Tom Dolle Design
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Newbomb Design
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Tom Dolle Design
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Newbomb Design in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tom Dolle Design in 2025.

Incident History — Newbomb Design (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Newbomb Design cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Tom Dolle Design (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tom Dolle Design cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lookout-brand-co..jpeg
Newbomb Design
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tom-dolle-design.jpeg
Tom Dolle Design
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Tom Dolle Design company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Newbomb Design company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Tom Dolle Design company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Newbomb Design company.

In the current year, Tom Dolle Design company and Newbomb Design company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Tom Dolle Design company nor Newbomb Design company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Tom Dolle Design company nor Newbomb Design company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Tom Dolle Design company nor Newbomb Design company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Newbomb Design company nor Tom Dolle Design company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Newbomb Design nor Tom Dolle Design holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Newbomb Design company nor Tom Dolle Design company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Newbomb Design company employs more people globally than Tom Dolle Design company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither Newbomb Design nor Tom Dolle Design holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Newbomb Design nor Tom Dolle Design holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Newbomb Design nor Tom Dolle Design holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Newbomb Design nor Tom Dolle Design holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Newbomb Design nor Tom Dolle Design holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Newbomb Design nor Tom Dolle Design holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
References
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References