Comparison Overview

Lonny Magazine

VS

Fitzhenry & Whiteside

Lonny Magazine

101 Redwood Shores Pkwy, Redwood City, California, 94065, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 700 and 749

OUR MISSION is to reopen the doors of accessible design. By embracing an online platform we provide inspiration at the click of a finger, directly connecting our readers to their favorite products and resources. Our freedom from page limits means that we can share more content in each issue, delivering an intimate look into the way people really live. At Lonny, we value independent thinking and believe not in following trends but rather in making choices that lead to happiness. We believe that good design and affordable design can coexist and that true inspiration can be found in the teeniest of homes or in the grandest of spaces.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Fitzhenry & Whiteside

195 Allstate Parkway, Markham, Ontario, L3R 4T8, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Fitzhenry & Whiteside is a private limited corporation owned by the Fitzhenry family with over 1,500 titles in print. We publish or reprint, through our group of companies, about 100 titles per annum. The house specializes in history, biography, poetry, sports, photographic books, reference, photography, and children’s and young adult titles.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lonny-magazine.jpeg
Lonny Magazine
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fitzhenry-&-whiteside.jpeg
Fitzhenry & Whiteside
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Lonny Magazine
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Fitzhenry & Whiteside
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lonny Magazine in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fitzhenry & Whiteside in 2025.

Incident History — Lonny Magazine (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lonny Magazine cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Fitzhenry & Whiteside (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fitzhenry & Whiteside cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lonny-magazine.jpeg
Lonny Magazine
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fitzhenry-&-whiteside.jpeg
Fitzhenry & Whiteside
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Fitzhenry & Whiteside company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Lonny Magazine company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Fitzhenry & Whiteside company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Lonny Magazine company.

In the current year, Fitzhenry & Whiteside company and Lonny Magazine company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Fitzhenry & Whiteside company nor Lonny Magazine company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Fitzhenry & Whiteside company nor Lonny Magazine company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Fitzhenry & Whiteside company nor Lonny Magazine company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Lonny Magazine company nor Fitzhenry & Whiteside company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Lonny Magazine nor Fitzhenry & Whiteside holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Lonny Magazine company nor Fitzhenry & Whiteside company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Fitzhenry & Whiteside company employs more people globally than Lonny Magazine company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Lonny Magazine nor Fitzhenry & Whiteside holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Lonny Magazine nor Fitzhenry & Whiteside holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Lonny Magazine nor Fitzhenry & Whiteside holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Lonny Magazine nor Fitzhenry & Whiteside holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Lonny Magazine nor Fitzhenry & Whiteside holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Lonny Magazine nor Fitzhenry & Whiteside holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.