Comparison Overview

Capitan Law

VS

Rollits LLP

Capitan Law

38 Regency Plaza, Glen Mills, Pennsylvania, 19342, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Our disability insurance lawyers fight to protect the rights of disabled individuals against insurance companies in group long term disability, individual disability, and group short term disability insurance matters. We have successfully represented the disabled against insurance companies such as New York Life (Life Insurance Company of North America), Lincoln, Prudential, MetLife, Hartford, Liberty Mutual, Unum, and many more. We are America's trusted disability insurance lawyers.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Rollits LLP

Citadel House, Hull, HU1 1QE, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Rollits is one of Yorkshire's leading law firms with offices in Hull and York. As a fast moving, forward thinking law firm rich with heritage, we are proud to be breaking the mould from the traditional law firm, working as a true partner, with each and every one of our clients and offering insightful, progressive advice and insight in multiple practice areas. Highly regarded as a commercial practice, we have an enviable client list including well known national and international names and work with a range of businesses from major PLCs to small private companies and substantial charitable organisations and institutions. We value the importance of sector knowledge and have developed sector expertise in the following areas: Agriculture and Horticulture, Charities and Social Enterprise, Education, Family Business, Food, Planning, Development and Construction, Renewables and Social Housing. Since 1999, we have held the Lexcel accreditation - the Law Society's international practice management standard. This kite mark is only awarded to firms that meet the highest management and customer care standards, and follows rigorous annual independent assessment to ensure the required standards of excellence are met.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 37
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/longtermdisabilitylawyers.jpeg
Capitan Law
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rollits.jpeg
Rollits LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Capitan Law
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Rollits LLP
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Capitan Law in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rollits LLP in 2025.

Incident History — Capitan Law (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Capitan Law cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Rollits LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rollits LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/longtermdisabilitylawyers.jpeg
Capitan Law
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rollits.jpeg
Rollits LLP
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Capitan Law company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Rollits LLP company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Rollits LLP company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Capitan Law company.

In the current year, Rollits LLP company and Capitan Law company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Rollits LLP company nor Capitan Law company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Rollits LLP company nor Capitan Law company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Rollits LLP company nor Capitan Law company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Capitan Law company nor Rollits LLP company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Capitan Law nor Rollits LLP holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Rollits LLP company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Capitan Law company.

Rollits LLP company employs more people globally than Capitan Law company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Capitan Law nor Rollits LLP holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Capitan Law nor Rollits LLP holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Capitan Law nor Rollits LLP holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Capitan Law nor Rollits LLP holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Capitan Law nor Rollits LLP holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Capitan Law nor Rollits LLP holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X