Comparison Overview

Longpré

VS

Dot Furniture

Longpré

The Claddings, Bruton, Somerset, BA10 0EH, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 1990 by master cabinet maker, Paul Longpré, and designer, Helen Moyers, Longpré is based in the historic Somerset town of Bruton in South West England. Our team of highly skilled bespoke cabinet makers create exceptional handcrafted furniture to individual specification on behalf of an extensive portfolio of international clients. Each piece displays an unmistakable clarity of detail and accuracy of line that remain the distinctive hallmarks of only the very finest cabinet makers.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 45
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Dot Furniture

3105 Dixie Road, Mississauga, Ontario, L4Y 3E4, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-26

D.O.T Furniture is a Canadian owned and operated retailer of home furnishings that started with a small store in Oakville but has since expanded into 19 locations across southern Ontario and now services customers from Whitby to London and St. Catharines to Orillia. Though the first store only carried basic backyard fare, like resin, aluminum framed and cushion furniture our stores currently carry the largest selection of outdoor furniture in styles to please all tastes and budgets. Our extensive collection of furniture is now widely recognized for its durability, aesthetic appeal and exceptional value. Building on the reputation and experience that DOT Furniture has acquired in the past twenty years, we have recently expanded our product mix. It includes an extensive selection of indoor furniture and casual living pieces that provides sophisticated solution to any setting. From urban condo living to suburban family dwellings DOT Furniture can furnish every room in your home.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 58
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/longpré.jpeg
Longpré
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dot-furniture.jpeg
Dot Furniture
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Longpré
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Dot Furniture
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Longpré in 2025.

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dot Furniture in 2025.

Incident History — Longpré (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Longpré cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Dot Furniture (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dot Furniture cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/longpré.jpeg
Longpré
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dot-furniture.jpeg
Dot Furniture
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Dot Furniture company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Longpré company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Dot Furniture company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Longpré company.

In the current year, Dot Furniture company and Longpré company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Dot Furniture company nor Longpré company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Dot Furniture company nor Longpré company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Dot Furniture company nor Longpré company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Longpré company nor Dot Furniture company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Longpré nor Dot Furniture holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Longpré company nor Dot Furniture company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Dot Furniture company employs more people globally than Longpré company, reflecting its scale as a Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing.

Neither Longpré nor Dot Furniture holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Longpré nor Dot Furniture holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Longpré nor Dot Furniture holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Longpré nor Dot Furniture holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Longpré nor Dot Furniture holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Longpré nor Dot Furniture holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.