Comparison Overview

Longfonds

VS

moss+ross

Longfonds

Stationsplein 127, Amersfoort, 3818 LE, NL
Last Update: 2025-12-18
Between 750 and 799

Vanaf je geboorte zorgen je longen voor zuurstof. Zodat je hart blijft kloppen en je hersenen blijven werken. Het Longfonds strijdt voor mensen met een longziekte en wil gezonde longen gezond houden. Want gezonde longen zijn van levensbelang. Zo willen we de beste zorg voor longpatiënten, voorkomen dat kinderen gaan roken en zetten we ons in voor gezonde scholen. Deze horen niet naast de snelweg. In Nederland hebben ruim 1 miljoen mensen een longziekte. Het Longfonds financiert onderzoek naar longziekten. Zo zoeken we naar een betere behandeling voor mensen met een ernstige longziekte en werken we aan een vaccin tegen astma. We willen longziekten zoals COPD en longfibrose stoppen. En nog mooier zou zijn als we in de toekomst beschadigde longen kunnen herstellen. Onze wens voor de toekomst komt steeds dichterbij: iedereen gezonde longen! www.longfonds.nl

NAICS: 561499
NAICS Definition: All Other Business Support Services
Employees: 156
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

moss+ross

undefined, Raleigh, North Carolina, 27603, US
Last Update: 2025-12-21
Between 750 and 799

moss+ross provides experienced and innovative consulting to strengthen North Carolina nonprofits. Our services are tailored to your needs. More than 290 area nonprofit and educational organizations have worked with us to achieve their goals. We serve sectors including higher education and independent schools, social services, environment, healthcare, museums and arts organizations, and faith communities. Each client is matched with a hand-picked team of partners and associates who have strong track records in fundraising and related fields. We are proud that our clients say they are stronger after our time together, and we remain invested in their success long after our engagements are complete.

NAICS: 561
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 44
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/longfonds.jpeg
Longfonds
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/moss-ross-llc.jpeg
moss+ross
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Longfonds
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
moss+ross
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Fundraising Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Longfonds in 2025.

Incidents vs Fundraising Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for moss+ross in 2025.

Incident History — Longfonds (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Longfonds cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — moss+ross (X = Date, Y = Severity)

moss+ross cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/longfonds.jpeg
Longfonds
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/moss-ross-llc.jpeg
moss+ross
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Longfonds company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to moss+ross company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, moss+ross company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Longfonds company.

In the current year, moss+ross company and Longfonds company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither moss+ross company nor Longfonds company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither moss+ross company nor Longfonds company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither moss+ross company nor Longfonds company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Longfonds company nor moss+ross company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Longfonds nor moss+ross holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Longfonds company nor moss+ross company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Longfonds company employs more people globally than moss+ross company, reflecting its scale as a Fundraising.

Neither Longfonds nor moss+ross holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Longfonds nor moss+ross holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Longfonds nor moss+ross holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Longfonds nor moss+ross holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Longfonds nor moss+ross holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Longfonds nor moss+ross holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Versa SASE Client for Windows versions released between 7.8.7 and 7.9.4 contain a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the audit log export functionality. The client communicates user-controlled file paths to a privileged service, which performs file system operations without impersonating the requesting user. Due to improper privilege handling and a time-of-check time-of-use race condition combined with symbolic link and mount point manipulation, a local authenticated attacker can coerce the service into deleting arbitrary directories with SYSTEM privileges. This can be exploited to delete protected system folders such as C:\\Config.msi and subsequently achieve execution as NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM via MSI rollback techniques.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' function in all versions up to, and including, 7.7. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to inject cross-site scripting into the 'status' parameter of applied jobs for any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 7.7 via the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to send a site-generated email with injected HTML to any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Description

The FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's `thegem_te_search` shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.32.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This vulnerability requires TheGem theme (premium) to be installed with Header Builder mode enabled, and the FiboSearch "Replace search bars" option enabled for TheGem integration.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

The Ultimate Member – User Profile, Registration, Login, Member Directory, Content Restriction & Membership Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.11.0 via the ajax_get_members function. This is due to the use of a predictable low-entropy token (5 hex characters derived from md5 of post ID) to identify member directories and insufficient authorization checks on the unauthenticated AJAX endpoint. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data including usernames, display names, user roles (including administrator accounts), profile URLs, and user IDs by enumerating predictable directory_id values or brute-forcing the small 16^5 token space.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N