Comparison Overview

Riding Warehouse

VS

Chums Ltd

Riding Warehouse

181 Suburban Rd, San Luis Obispo, CA, 93401, US
Last Update: 2025-12-26
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.RidingWarehouse.com

Riding Warehouse strives to exceed all expectations for an online tack store, offering the best possible experience and products for you and your horse. Conveniently shop by discipline: English, Western or Endurance, where you'll discover tack, riding apparel and a full range of horse care supplies for the equine enthusiast. What sets us apart? Horse-savvy customer service, fast delivery to your door, and the best return policy in the industry.

NAICS: 454
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Chums Ltd

Unity Grove, Liverpool, Merseyside, L34 9AR, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-26
Between 750 and 799
https://www.chums.co.uk

Chums is a privately owned home shopping company with the head offices based in Knowsley Business Park, Liverpool. Our founder Graham Rubin established the company in 1981 after gaining years of experience working within the trouser manufacturing industry that supplied other large mail order catalogue businesses at the time. Having realised the UK manufacturing industry was in decline, Graham spotted a gap in the market and decided to set up Chums. Chums initially focused on selling Mens trousers, but overtime expanded the Menswear range to include suits, coats & jackets, shirts & tops, knitwear, leisurewear, nightwear, underwear and footwear. Over the years Chums have diversified and developed ranges within Ladieswear, Homeware, Gifts and Mobility. Chums continue to operate as a family run company with Graham's sons Adam and Josh working within the business, which employs approximately 200 staff based in an 80,000 square foot unit.

NAICS: 454
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 99
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/long-riders-gear.jpeg
Riding Warehouse
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chums-ltd.jpeg
Chums Ltd
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Riding Warehouse
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Chums Ltd
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Online and Mail Order Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Riding Warehouse in 2025.

Incidents vs Online and Mail Order Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Chums Ltd in 2025.

Incident History — Riding Warehouse (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Riding Warehouse cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Chums Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Chums Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/long-riders-gear.jpeg
Riding Warehouse
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chums-ltd.jpeg
Chums Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Chums Ltd company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Riding Warehouse company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Chums Ltd company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Riding Warehouse company.

In the current year, Chums Ltd company and Riding Warehouse company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Chums Ltd company nor Riding Warehouse company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Chums Ltd company nor Riding Warehouse company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Chums Ltd company nor Riding Warehouse company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Riding Warehouse company nor Chums Ltd company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Riding Warehouse nor Chums Ltd holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Riding Warehouse company nor Chums Ltd company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Chums Ltd company employs more people globally than Riding Warehouse company, reflecting its scale as a Online and Mail Order Retail.

Neither Riding Warehouse nor Chums Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Riding Warehouse nor Chums Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Riding Warehouse nor Chums Ltd holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Riding Warehouse nor Chums Ltd holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Riding Warehouse nor Chums Ltd holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Riding Warehouse nor Chums Ltd holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was found in Tenda WH450 1.0.0.18. Affected is an unknown function of the file /goform/PPTPUserSetting. Performing manipulation of the argument delno results in stack-based buffer overflow. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been made public and could be used.

Published
Date
2025-12-28
Updated
Date
2025-12-28
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 8.3
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:C/I:C/A:C
cvss3
Base: 7.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A vulnerability has been found in Tenda WH450 1.0.0.18. This impacts an unknown function of the file /goform/PPTPServer. Such manipulation of the argument ip1 leads to stack-based buffer overflow. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

Published
Date
2025-12-28
Updated
Date
2025-12-28
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 8.3
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:C/I:C/A:C
cvss3
Base: 7.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A flaw has been found in omec-project UPF up to 2.1.3-dev. This affects the function handleSessionEstablishmentRequest of the file /pfcpiface/pfcpiface/messages_session.go of the component PFCP Session Establishment Request Handler. This manipulation causes null pointer dereference. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

Published
Date
2025-12-28
Updated
Date
2025-12-28
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:N/A:P
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in floooh sokol up to 16cbcc864012898793cd2bc57f802499a264ea40. The impacted element is the function _sg_pipeline_desc_defaults in the library sokol_gfx.h. The manipulation results in stack-based buffer overflow. The attack requires a local approach. The exploit is now public and may be used. This product does not use versioning. This is why information about affected and unaffected releases are unavailable. The patch is identified as 5d11344150973f15e16d3ec4ee7550a73fb995e0. It is advisable to implement a patch to correct this issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-28
Updated
Date
2025-12-28
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in PbootCMS up to 3.2.12. The affected element is the function get_user_ip of the file core/function/handle.php of the component Header Handler. The manipulation of the argument X-Forwarded-For leads to use of less trusted source. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

Published
Date
2025-12-28
Updated
Date
2025-12-28
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References