Comparison Overview

Lone Star Flight Museum

VS

National Amusement Park Historical Association

Lone Star Flight Museum

11551 Aerospace Avenue, Houston, Texas, 77034, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01

The Lone Star Flight Museum's (LSFM) mission is to celebrate flight and achievement in Texas aviation history; and educate and engage our youth through Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM). Lead by Anna Hawley, LSFM opened its $38 million state-of-the-art museum on Labor Day weekend 2017 at Ellington Field in Houston, TX. Founded in 1985, the 130,000 square foot museum includes the Texas Aviation Hall of Fame, historic aircraft and period artifacts, and a $1 million Aviation Learning Center featuring simulator-based STEM (science, technology, engineering and math) curriculum, that provides a hands-on, interactive learning environment to inspire and educate students. LSFM’s vision is to be a world-class educational museum linking an understanding of the past with inspiration for the future.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 34
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

National Amusement Park Historical Association

PO Box 871, None, Lombard, IL, US, 60148-0871
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799

The National Amusement Park Historical Association, (NAPHA) is an international not-for-profit tax-exempt corporation dedicated to the preservation, documentation and enjoyment of the amusement and theme park industry - past, present and future. NAPHA is the worlds’ only educational and enthusiast organization dedicated to all aspects of the amusement or theme park. The organization’s purpose is to preserve, through documentation, the history of the amusement park and theme park industry, past and present; to promote, through knowledge and awareness, the enjoyment of amusement and theme parks; to inform members and the public, through our publications, about historical and current information regarding the amusement and theme park industry; to furnish educational presentations to libraries, civic groups, private clubs or any organization about the amusement and theme park industry; and, to bring together people with a mutual interest in the amusement and theme park industry. The NAPHA Archives includes printed materials, correspondence, blueprints, photos, press releases, and NAD newspaper clippings. Other material in the NAPHA Archives include information on fun houses, roller coasters, water rides, miscellaneous rides, trains and locomotives and amusement parks. NAPHA continues to add materials such as reference books, magazines, brochures and press kits, photos, postcards, slides and videotapes and other artifacts to the Archives and author-donated amusement books.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lone-star-flight-museum.jpeg
Lone Star Flight Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-amusement-park-historical-association.jpeg
National Amusement Park Historical Association
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Lone Star Flight Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
National Amusement Park Historical Association
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lone Star Flight Museum in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for National Amusement Park Historical Association in 2025.

Incident History — Lone Star Flight Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lone Star Flight Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — National Amusement Park Historical Association (X = Date, Y = Severity)

National Amusement Park Historical Association cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lone-star-flight-museum.jpeg
Lone Star Flight Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-amusement-park-historical-association.jpeg
National Amusement Park Historical Association
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Lone Star Flight Museum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to National Amusement Park Historical Association company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, National Amusement Park Historical Association company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Lone Star Flight Museum company.

In the current year, National Amusement Park Historical Association company and Lone Star Flight Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither National Amusement Park Historical Association company nor Lone Star Flight Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither National Amusement Park Historical Association company nor Lone Star Flight Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither National Amusement Park Historical Association company nor Lone Star Flight Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Lone Star Flight Museum company nor National Amusement Park Historical Association company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Lone Star Flight Museum nor National Amusement Park Historical Association holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Lone Star Flight Museum company nor National Amusement Park Historical Association company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Lone Star Flight Museum company employs more people globally than National Amusement Park Historical Association company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Lone Star Flight Museum nor National Amusement Park Historical Association holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Lone Star Flight Museum nor National Amusement Park Historical Association holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Lone Star Flight Museum nor National Amusement Park Historical Association holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Lone Star Flight Museum nor National Amusement Park Historical Association holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Lone Star Flight Museum nor National Amusement Park Historical Association holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Lone Star Flight Museum nor National Amusement Park Historical Association holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X