Comparison Overview

London Transport Museum

VS

Museums of Old York

London Transport Museum

39 Wellington Street , London, Westminster, GB, WC2E 7BB
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799

London Transport Museum explores the story of London and its transport system over the last 200 years, highlighting the powerful link between transport and the growth of modern London, culture and society since 1800. We care for over 450,000 items - preserving, researching and acquiring objects to use in our galleries, exhibitions and other activities. As well as exploring the past, the Museum looks at present-day transport developments and concepts for urban transportation in the future, which includes a contemporary collecting policy for the benefit of future generations.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 253
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Museums of Old York

3 Lindsay Road, York, ME, 03909, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799

The Museums of Old York is the product of a merger of three historical organizations founded in York with histories dating back more than a hundred years. The Mission of the Museums of Old York is to preserve and promote the rich history of the York region through programs and educational experiences that enhance historical perspective and build on community pride. We have 8 different buildings highlighting various aspects of York life, decorative arts, contemporary art, and social history located throughout York Village.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/london-transport-museum.jpeg
London Transport Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/museums-of-old-york.jpeg
Museums of Old York
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
London Transport Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Museums of Old York
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for London Transport Museum in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Museums of Old York in 2026.

Incident History — London Transport Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

London Transport Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Museums of Old York (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Museums of Old York cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/london-transport-museum.jpeg
London Transport Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/museums-of-old-york.jpeg
Museums of Old York
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

London Transport Museum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Museums of Old York company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Museums of Old York company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to London Transport Museum company.

In the current year, Museums of Old York company and London Transport Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Museums of Old York company nor London Transport Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Museums of Old York company nor London Transport Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Museums of Old York company nor London Transport Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither London Transport Museum company nor Museums of Old York company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither London Transport Museum nor Museums of Old York holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither London Transport Museum company nor Museums of Old York company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

London Transport Museum company employs more people globally than Museums of Old York company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither London Transport Museum nor Museums of Old York holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither London Transport Museum nor Museums of Old York holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither London Transport Museum nor Museums of Old York holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither London Transport Museum nor Museums of Old York holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither London Transport Museum nor Museums of Old York holds HIPAA certification.

Neither London Transport Museum nor Museums of Old York holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.